User talk:TParis

This is TParis's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

This administrator has volunteered for an administrator review. You may comment on his or her administrative actions at Wikipedia:Administrator review/TParis 2.

If you have come here to change my opinion, be ready to also change yours.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

UTRS review

Happy Fourth. I'm new (as you know :-)) to UTRS, but it looks like this may be a filter false-positive that's fallen through the cracks. Okay to unblock? All the best, Miniapolis 17:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

None of us know the reason for the block and overturning checkuser blocks w/o good reason isn't a good thing to do. Waiting for RE to return.--v/r - T P 18:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, and thanks for the advice. All the best, Miniapolis 00:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 19:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COIN proposal

Hi TP, would you please comment on this? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with the proposal as long as it is not used to harass editors as a polemic list. There needs to be some level of enforcement.--v/r - T P 21:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am so, so with you there. Thanks for replying. Jytdog (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thank you for your support of me during a recent situation regarding another editor. I really appreciate it, Daniellagreen ^(talk) ^(cont) 00:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniellagreen: Just make sure to keep yourself on the straight and narrow and don't make any of us eat our words.--v/r - T P 00:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I always govern myself accordingly. Thanks again, Daniellagreen ^(talk) ^(cont) 00:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:MH17

Thanks. Why is nothing ever simple? Reedy (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(shrug). I don't know. Thousands of different people from different parts of the world of different cultures is probably a contributing factor.--v/r - T P 19:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014

Your Military History Newsletter

Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results
Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content
Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media
Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Please restore the link and first sentence of my comment removed at [1]. It is part of my comment: It is the first sentence. It is not a polemical statement meant to piss people off. There is no comparison with drunk driving. --Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 04:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]