User talk:Teflon Peter Christ: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 66: Line 66:
:What about his comments earlier? [[User:Teflon Peter Christ|𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃]] ([[User talk:Teflon Peter Christ|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Teflon Peter Christ|contribs]]) 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
:What about his comments earlier? [[User:Teflon Peter Christ|𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃]] ([[User talk:Teflon Peter Christ|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Teflon Peter Christ|contribs]]) 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
::Give me a diff. In that thread all they do is refer to your block which is not a [[WP:PA]]. I suggest stepping away at least for a bit. [[User:S0091|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091|talk]]) 20:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
::Give me a diff. In that thread all they do is refer to your block which is not a [[WP:PA]]. I suggest stepping away at least for a bit. [[User:S0091|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091|talk]]) 20:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
:::Oh, so you're commenting on threads you haven't actually thoroughly read? [[User:Teflon Peter Christ|𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃]] ([[User talk:Teflon Peter Christ|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Teflon Peter Christ|contribs]]) 20:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:31, 21 November 2023

January 2023

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Heathers and User talk:YouCanDoBetter) for Personal attacks and disruptive editing to prove a point.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teflon Peter Christ (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I understand and take responsibility for my actions, that they were wrong and totally misguided, driven to make a point, out of petty emotion and ego, insecurity, frustration, etc. And I vow never to do it again. I have no particular interest or need in revisiting the aforementioned pages, but if I were to, I intend on doing so with positive contributions. I say all this, above all, to clean my conscience, come what result may. Thank you. And apologies to the parties involved and attacked by me, and those left with the task of addressing the report. 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk contribs) 14:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you do not plan to edit those pages, there's no reason to consider lifting the block. It's also much, much too soon. Build up a substantial history of constructive edits elsewhere, then consider contesting the block. Yamla (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Peter. Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to.

Replaceable fair use File:Theme from Shaft.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Theme from Shaft.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Family Affair sample.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Family Affair sample.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Home Is Where the Hatred Is sample.ogg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bad faith templates.

Please see: WP:DONTTEMPLATETHEREGULARS and also review WP:3RR while you're at it because you've reverted me more than I've reverted you. If you were to go to WP:AN3 right now, you'd be the only party facing any sanctions. Meanwhile, I'm the one here without any active sanctions on my account...

Also, templating someone you're in a content dispute with is poor form. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  14:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chrisgau on Cheetah magazine's Wiki page

Hey there. Given your editing history, I gather you are a big Christgau reader. I thought of you when I saw him recently lamenting on his Substack the sad state of the Cheetah magazine wiki page. I don’t have time to look up sources to see if there is much to be written about it, but it could be a fun project. I hope all is well with you. Cheers. Tkbrett (✉) 18:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hah! Yeah i saw that piece this morning. Interested, for sure... thanks mah brutha 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 22:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sir Teflon. Share your thoughts regarding the album if you wish to. 183.171.120.165 (talk) 05:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:TlonicChronic. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about his comments earlier? 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 19:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Give me a diff. In that thread all they do is refer to your block which is not a WP:PA. I suggest stepping away at least for a bit. S0091 (talk) 20:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so you're commenting on threads you haven't actually thoroughly read? 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk | contribs) 20:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]