User talk:Timotheus Canens: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Trout this user
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
597,462 edits
m Archiving 5 thread(s) (older than 3d) to User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2010/12.
→‎/* Suspected sock: */ new section
Line 56: Line 56:
Saw you blocked {{user|Rouxsd}} for socking; another likely sock just popped on another [[water fluoridation controversy|fluoridation page]] and is vandalizing: {{user|Darthvaderscpso}} and was hoping you could help out. [[User:Yobol|Yobol]] ([[User talk:Yobol|talk]]) 04:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Saw you blocked {{user|Rouxsd}} for socking; another likely sock just popped on another [[water fluoridation controversy|fluoridation page]] and is vandalizing: {{user|Darthvaderscpso}} and was hoping you could help out. [[User:Yobol|Yobol]] ([[User talk:Yobol|talk]]) 04:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
:As they're all posting effectively the same thing, maybe a text filter might help? After all, they're picking random pages at this point... [[User:HalfShadow|<font color="gray">'''Half'''</font>]][[User talk:HalfShadow|<font color="black">'''Shadow'''</font>]] 05:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
:As they're all posting effectively the same thing, maybe a text filter might help? After all, they're picking random pages at this point... [[User:HalfShadow|<font color="gray">'''Half'''</font>]][[User talk:HalfShadow|<font color="black">'''Shadow'''</font>]] 05:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

== /* Suspected sock */ ==

Hello Tim, you have email. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">'''[[User talk:Nableezy|<font color="#C11B17">nableezy</font>]]''' - 21:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)</font></small>

Revision as of 21:08, 13 December 2010

Please click here to leave me a new message.
AfC submissions
Random submission
3+ months
2,548 pending submissions
Purge to update

Notes

Notes
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
July 2010
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
March 2010
PGP key 
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
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=
=oCnW
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

Shuki

Shuki? Clearly not a new editor. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 07:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Different continents, according to a CU. T. Canens (talk) 01:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked anyway. I don't care (or know) who it is, but it is clearly not a new user. T. Canens (talk) 01:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if this is enough for a check but… what about JackJud? 100-edit user only comes out of hibernation whenever a Jewish or Israeli-related AfD/CfD shows up: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Also, most of his other edits are just adding Jewish categories to pages [11], [12]. Bulldog123 03:57, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was under the impression that simply because someone was apparently not a new user was no reason to block them. This person may have a legitimate reason for an alternative account, or may simply be a quick learner. It is wrong to block an editor without any evidence at all simply because he is not a new user, per WP:Sock puppetry. Take the person up for an SPI but don't go blocking editors simply because they appear to be experienced. This is wrong. 172.129.11.197 (talk) 04:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tim I am absolutely shocked at this. I can bring you a list of users I can think offeon the top of my head whose early edit history shows very decisively that they are not new. If this is grounds for block with no questions asked, should I expect that they will be blocked? Some of these users have been editing in high volume for a few months and have not been blocked for some strange reason. 74.198.9.177 (talk) 04:55, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I have to say that I agree with the sentiments expressed above. I looked at the subject editor's contributions and saw nothing that would cause alarm bells. When I first started editing, I was technically inept and in some respects, I still am but not everyone is as bumbling as me and some learn quicker than others. Just my two cents for what its worth.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Right... so... which one of your friend's socks was that? Sockpuppetry is legitimate as long as it's not used to vote-stack or sway consensus. See no reason why they can't come forward if everything checks out. Bulldog123 06:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Jiujitsuguy (and the IPs from Virginia and Canada). By that test, any number of editors, including editors in the same discussion such as my good friend User:Therexbanner, would be blocked. I would think the normal checkuser process is the way to start such an enquiry.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could these people be any more self-incriminating? Now honestly. Bulldog123 09:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed alternate accounts may not edit project space (which they did); be used to violate policies and guidelines such as WP:NPA (with they also did, with the accusations of racism); the list goes on. There is nothing legitimate here, and why am I not surprised that we have a bunch of IPs commenting here whose only edit is to support the blocked user? The block stands. WP:ANI is thataway if you want to challenge it. T. Canens (talk) 00:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also an interesting selection of people you're getting to come "support" a totally new user they've had no interaction with as of now. Bulldog123 04:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reversion on list of banned user

thumb Hi,

Why did you do this revertion below? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AList_of_banned_users&action=historysubmit&diff=401690677&oldid=401690148

thanks --Censor (talk) 23:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Probably because attention-starved Jessica has been busy all day petitioning random people on IRC to have it reinstated. She really needs to disconnect from WP and move on - Alison ❤ 23:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Alison - just emailed you on this, but this was a mistake... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 01:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • FYI - I have restored it again, after emailing Alison. There are several months more history to this than one day's IRC misbehavior, and RBI was applied from on high. Contact me in email for further email contacts to include in the discussion if you want to consider changing this. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 01:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • George, you really shouldn't have re-instated that. Please check your email. WP:DNFT an' all that. Seriously - now it's turning into a dramafest, which is exactly what I was trying to avoid. Adding it really doesn't help matters at all - Alison ❤ 01:41, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
          • I reverted because it's not a good idea to revert an checkuser/oversighter who is presumably familiar with the case for no stated reason. I don't really care either way. Now, could you guys take it *somewhere else*? I don't like seeing my talk page defaced by that ugly image. Nor the constant orange "you have a new message" bars. T. Canens (talk) 01:44, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
            • Well excuuuuse me! Myself and GWH have taken it to email (and here's another orange bar ;) ) - Alison ❤ 02:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ZjarriRrethues

Is this [13] (TC presumably refers to you) true? Just checking. Athenean (talk) 08:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. T. Canens (talk) 11:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sock

Saw you blocked Rouxsd (talk · contribs) for socking; another likely sock just popped on another fluoridation page and is vandalizing: Darthvaderscpso (talk · contribs) and was hoping you could help out. Yobol (talk) 04:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As they're all posting effectively the same thing, maybe a text filter might help? After all, they're picking random pages at this point... HalfShadow 05:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* Suspected sock */

Hello Tim, you have email. nableezy - 21:08, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timotheus_Canens&oldid=402209046"