User talk:TreasuryTag

TreasuryTag is currently, or is going to be, away from Wikipedia, between April 14 and April 19, 2009, and may not be able to respond immediately to queries. He may, however, edit a little unless he's using the splendid Wikibreak enforcer.

---

This page is semi-protected. IPs can leave me a message HERE instead. Sorry for the inconvenience.

---

Just to fix the formatting...

Picture of the day

De Viron Castle

Photograph credit: Benoit Brummer

• Archive
• More featured pictures

User talkpages

Hi TT. You'll recall, possibly, that I've previously reverted an editor who spammed your talkpage?

I take the view that if editors remove a post from their talkpage, they're acknowledging that they've read it, and that reposting the same message - or essentially the same message is uncalled for. Giftiger wunsch knows all about ANI: if you feel the need to raise an issue at ANI do it, and let them know after you've done it. Frankly, this whole incident was in poor taste, and what annoys me most is that you could easily have handled it far better.

TFOWR 09:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I've responded on your talkpage, but in short, nowhere did I object to the deletion of posts. (Can you show me a diff of where I did?) I did not repost the same message: I simply gave more than one warning for gross incivility before taking the issue to ANI, as is expected of level-headed editors. Your message gives the distinct impression that you have no problem with the personal attacks emanating from Giftiger today, and I would be grateful if you could disabuse me of this notion. ╟─TreasuryTag►presiding officer─╢ 09:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Also replied on my talkpage, but in general - no, I don't have a problem with what editors say either on their own talkpages or in edit summaries when editing their own talkpages. I also cut editors a great deal more slack when there's an appearance of baiting, which, with the best will in the world, there is here. TFOWR 09:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

(More on your talkpage.) Well, you are welcome to your opinion, but I don't see WP:NPA stating, "Editors are entitled to make personal attacks within their own userspace," so I am not sure that this is a legitimate tack for you to take with me! ╟─TreasuryTag►Lord Speaker─╢ 09:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

• UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups

• News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative

• In the news: Foundation plans, David Barton, dangerous occasional glitches

• Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. While, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; leaving tendentious comments that only tend to lead to flame wars, as you did at Talk:The Lodger (Doctor Who), is considered both bad practice and disruptive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Additionally, for someone who asks to not be left impersonal templates, I would tink that you would try to do the same. Please do not litter my page with your posts in the future. If you find that you take issue with my actions or posts, take them to the appropriate noticeboard and have someone illuminate why I likely made them, or allow them to interact with me. From our brushes with one another, I feel it is likely best for me to not pollute my Wikipedia experience by dealing with people like you. Your block log pretty much says it all. I think we're done here.- Jack Sebastian (talk) 13:47, 15 July 2010 (UTC)