Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 April 28: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:45, 12 May 2009

< April 27	April 29 >

April 28

File:Underground entrance.jpg

Photographer does not own copyright to statue. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 03:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose deletion, undeletion requested. It is completely unwarranted. It is ridiculous that a photo cannot include a statue or any other outdoor object on a public street, regardless of the object's copyright. It is the freedom of panorama. Even if the law somehow fails to include this obvious provision, the photo is still fair use and therefore should be restored with such a license tag and rationale. –radiojon (talk) 14:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be copyvio from here. Uploader claims to be copyright holder, but image is from a major studio and is watermarked. Radiant chains (talk) 06:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Billa01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-watermarked version of File:Billa1.jpg. Widely available on the internet, unlikely that uploader is copyright holder. Radiant chains (talk) 07:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aidaluna_seatrial.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from [1]. Rettetast (talk) 13:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stateroom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from [2]. Rettetast (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Musicportal.gif

Displays copyrighted content (Windows interface) Stifle (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The look of the "Windows interface" is not copyrightable and the icons fall under De minimis. Tothwolf (talk) 23:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The look of the Windows interface absolutely is copyrightable, though this image may not infringe on that copyright. The icons may well be de minimis... but it should be possible to crop the image. Then again, it isn't included anywhere, and was only useful in a comment nearly 2 years ago. Is it still needed? Is it okay with you if it's deleted? – Quadell ^(talk) 13:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree on the Windows interface look being copyrightable. The actual code/implementation is certainly copyrightable but the look itself is not. See Look and feel and Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc.. I have no opinion on this file itself but "Displays copyrighted content (Windows interface)" is not a valid argument and reason for deletion. Tothwolf (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For that fact, there are a lot more screenshots linked in that discussion than just this one. Tothwolf (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GOLD screenshot.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted

Uploader is unlikely to have the right to release this image into the public domain. Stifle (talk) 13:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Devin Cook is the software author, he has every right to release a screenshot of his own software into the public domain if he so chooses. The other screenshots such as File:GOLD_Builder_v3.4.gif are already on Commons, this one should be moved there as well. Tothwolf (talk) 23:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SMHpic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the image is from the Syndey Morning Herald then I'm doubtful that the uploader is the copyright holder. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ==== [[:File:Underground entrance.jpg]] ====
-<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
-:''The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. <span style="color:Brown">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this section. '' <!--Template:Pui top-->
-:{{#if:|The result of the discussion was: }}
-[[Category:Archived image and media for deletion discussions]]
-The result of the debate was: '''Delete'''; deleted by {{admin|Quadell}} [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<font color="#888800">⚡</font>]] 14:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 Photographer does not own copyright to statue. ▫ '''[[User:JohnnyMrNinja|<font color="#202040">Johnny</font><font color="#204040">Mr</font><font color="#206040">Nin</font><font color="#204040">ja</font>]]''' 03:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Strongly oppose deletion, undeletion requested'''.  It is completely unwarranted.  It is ridiculous that a photo cannot include a statue or any other outdoor object on a public street, regardless of the object's copyright.  It is the [[freedom of panorama]].  Even if the law somehow fails to include this obvious provision, the photo is still [[fair use]] and therefore should be restored with such a license tag and rationale. &nbsp;–[[User:Radiojon|radiojon]] ([[User talk:Radiojon|talk]]) 14:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:Brown">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Pui bottom--></div>
 ==== [[:File:Billa1.jpg]] ====