Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rm dummy text
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 7: Line 7:
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=43%</noinclude>}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=43%</noinclude>}}
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>

== China-Taiwan articles ==
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:Silence of Lambs|Silence of Lambs]] ([[User talk:Silence of Lambs|talk]]) '''at''' 05:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

=== Involved parties ===
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|Silence of Lambs}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|Félix An}}
*{{userlinks|JMonkey2006}}
*{{admin|DrIdiot}}
*{{admin|Chipmunkdavis}}
*{{userlinks|Matt Smith}}
*{{userlinks|DMacks}}

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*[diff of notification Félix An]
*[diff of notification JMonkey2006]
*[diff of notification DrIdiot]
*[diff of notification Chipmunkdavis]
*[diff of notification Matt Smith]
*[diff of notification DMacks]

;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration -->
*Link 1
*Link 2

=== Statement by Silence of Lambs ===
On the [[Talk:China]] page which I requested to rename the articles China to People’s Republic of China and Taiwan to Republic of China because [[Two Chinas]] exist, the change was turned down per [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. In addition to above, because a dozen edits on the PRC-ROC articles were constantly reverted most of the time, I am calling for the 30/500 enforcement on any China-related articles similar to the [[WP:ARBPIA|Arab-Israeli conflict arbitration]] and the ones found at [[WP:ARBIPA|India-Pakistan]]. Although I am not good with long words, the scope would target Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan-related articles such as the [[Tibet Area (administrative division)]] reverted by [[User:Kautilya3]] without consensus.
=== Statement by Félix An ===

=== Statement by JMonkey2006 ===
=== Statement by DrIdiot ===
=== Statement by Chipmunkdavis ===
=== Statement by Matt Smith ===
=== Statement by DMacks ===
=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->

=== China-Taiwan articles: Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
*

=== China-Taiwan articles: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> ===
{{anchor|1=China-Taiwan articles: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
*


Revision as of 05:58, 12 April 2021

Requests for arbitration

China-Taiwan articles

Initiated by Silence of Lambs (talk) at 05:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
  • [diff of notification Félix An]
  • [diff of notification JMonkey2006]
  • [diff of notification DrIdiot]
  • [diff of notification Chipmunkdavis]
  • [diff of notification Matt Smith]
  • [diff of notification DMacks]
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
  • Link 1
  • Link 2

Statement by Silence of Lambs

On the Talk:China page which I requested to rename the articles China to People’s Republic of China and Taiwan to Republic of China because Two Chinas exist, the change was turned down per WP:COMMONNAME. In addition to above, because a dozen edits on the PRC-ROC articles were constantly reverted most of the time, I am calling for the 30/500 enforcement on any China-related articles similar to the Arab-Israeli conflict arbitration and the ones found at India-Pakistan. Although I am not good with long words, the scope would target Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan-related articles such as the Tibet Area (administrative division) reverted by User:Kautilya3 without consensus.

Statement by Félix An

Statement by JMonkey2006

Statement by DrIdiot

Statement by Chipmunkdavis

Statement by Matt Smith

Statement by DMacks

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

China-Taiwan articles: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

China-Taiwan articles: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)