Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children in a Chariot

Children in a Chariot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable painting that has received little to no coverage, failing WP:GNG. Highway 89 (talk) 22:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:57, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I’m not clear how any work by Goya isn’t notable, but a search in google books shows multiple works discussing it as part of Goya’s oeuvre. The linked article on fr.wiki has multiple refs. Mccapra (talk) 23:05, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, an obvious keep which just needs a reference, and per Mccapra. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:10, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Another irritatingly useless article by this editor, taking up other people's time. A proper articles on the series would be better. Johnbod (talk) 04:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Johnbod, the creator of the article, DilletantiAnonymous has not responded to calls for better sourcing of their stubs, except this one time. I don't think we can expect a change in behaviour. The list at User talk:DilletantiAnonymous/Inlinesourcesneeded hasn't been maintained. If we think the mass-creation of unattributed translations is disruptive, we should propose a community ban of some form. Vexations (talk) 11:30, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know, some of the calls have been mine! Lots of his stuff just repeats, reworded, the 2-3 lines on the museum site. I'd like a ban on new stub/article creation certainly, but I think that would be an innovative move. Worth the attempt perhaps. Johnbod (talk) 13:32, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 08:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, a painting from such a noted artist reminds me of point no. 5 of WP:NBOOK : "The book's author is so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable." just substitute book and author with work and artist, anyway, having a look at the French WP article on this painting (thanks Mccapra) shows enough references to meet WP:GNG. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:23, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article needs to be fleshed out, but sources exist in Google Books.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 13:01, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nominator claims little to no coverage, but [1] has an extensive bibliography. Vexations (talk) 11:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep yet another article in need of a willing editor.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:47, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]