Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungarian scripts: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Rovosaman - "→Hungarian scripts: " |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Hungarian scripts}}) |
:({{Find sources|Hungarian scripts}}) |
||
This article is part of the original poster's campaign to try to get Original Research into the Wikipedia. There is no [[Hungarian Latin-based script]]: there is jus t[[Hungarian orthography]] to which that link resolves. There is no [[Szekely-Hungarian_Rovas script]]: this just resolves to [[Old Hungarian]], as it should. And there is no [[Carpathian_Basin_Rovas]]; this is a modern Original Research fantasy as the "script" in question is linguistically untenable. It's difficult to know how to file an AfD for "pseudoscience" but that's what we've got here. -- [[User:Evertype|Evertype]]·[[User_talk:Evertype|✆]] 20:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC) |
This article is part of the original poster's campaign to try to get Original Research into the Wikipedia. There is no [[Hungarian Latin-based script]]: there is jus t[[Hungarian orthography]] to which that link resolves. There is no [[Szekely-Hungarian_Rovas script]]: this just resolves to [[Old Hungarian]], as it should. And there is no [[Carpathian_Basin_Rovas]]; this is a modern Original Research fantasy as the "script" in question is linguistically untenable. It's difficult to know how to file an AfD for "pseudoscience" but that's what we've got here. -- [[User:Evertype|Evertype]]·[[User_talk:Evertype|✆]] 20:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
:It is a strong private opinion. Please consult linguistic literature before any comment. At the Unicode only Mr Everson and on the Wikipedia only Evertype is propagating out-dated viewpoints. I suppose they are same persons. Please see Wikipedia NPOV article, and check your statements concerning "original work". Do not destroy articles, please use Discussion pages at each articles, any comment, viewpoint can be debated on these pages. The Deletion Request as first step is not acceptable, during the uploading process. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rovosaman|Rovosaman]] ([[User talk:Rovosaman|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rovosaman|contribs]]) 10:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
:It is a strong private opinion. Please consult linguistic literature before any comment. At the Unicode only Mr Everson and on the Wikipedia only Evertype is propagating out-dated viewpoints. I suppose they are same persons. Please see Wikipedia NPOV article, and check your statements concerning "original work". Do not destroy articles, please use Discussion pages at each articles, any comment, viewpoint can be debated on these pages. The Deletion Request as first step is not acceptable, during the uploading process. [[User:Rovosaman|Rovosaman]] ([[User talk:Rovosaman|talk]]) 10:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rovosaman|Rovosaman]] ([[User talk:Rovosaman|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rovosaman|contribs]]) 10:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
*'''Delete''' Self-promotion of original research and nom's reasons. See also edits to the same series of articles by another account, {{user|Rovosaman}}. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 20:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Self-promotion of original research and nom's reasons. See also edits to the same series of articles by another account, {{user|Rovosaman}}. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 20:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hungary|list of Hungary-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Logan|Logan]] <sub>[[User_talk:Logan|Talk]]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Logan|Contributions]]</sup> 21:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hungary|list of Hungary-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>— [[User:Logan|Logan]] <sub>[[User_talk:Logan|Talk]]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Logan|Contributions]]</sup> 21:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)</small> |
||
Revision as of 10:47, 26 June 2011
Hungarian scripts
- Hungarian scripts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is part of the original poster's campaign to try to get Original Research into the Wikipedia. There is no Hungarian Latin-based script: there is jus tHungarian orthography to which that link resolves. There is no Szekely-Hungarian_Rovas script: this just resolves to Old Hungarian, as it should. And there is no Carpathian_Basin_Rovas; this is a modern Original Research fantasy as the "script" in question is linguistically untenable. It's difficult to know how to file an AfD for "pseudoscience" but that's what we've got here. -- Evertype·✆ 20:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- It is a strong private opinion. Please consult linguistic literature before any comment. At the Unicode only Mr Everson and on the Wikipedia only Evertype is propagating out-dated viewpoints. I suppose they are same persons. Please see Wikipedia NPOV article, and check your statements concerning "original work". Do not destroy articles, please use Discussion pages at each articles, any comment, viewpoint can be debated on these pages. The Deletion Request as first step is not acceptable, during the uploading process. Rovosaman (talk) 10:47, 26 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rovosaman (talk • contribs) 10:12, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Self-promotion of original research and nom's reasons. See also edits to the same series of articles by another account, Rovosaman (talk · contribs). Dougweller (talk) 20:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. — Logan Talk Contributions 21:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Logan Talk Contributions 21:06, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note The AfD template on this and related articles was removed by the articles' creator, I've replaced them. Dougweller (talk) 09:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- The relations of the Szekely-Hungarian Rovas the Carpathian Basin Rovas and the Khazarian Rovas are supported several scholars; some of them are cited in the related Wikipedia articles. Rovasscript (talk) 09:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)