User talk:Rovosaman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 17:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011[edit]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Turkic ideograms. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue removingArticles for deletion without addressing the issue, as you did with Khazarian Rovas, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dougweller (talk) 09:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

thank you for your notification. I supposed that there is a vandalism from Evertype, who is uncooperative, because He/She simply wants to delete the pages instead of starting debate on the Discussion page. Please check User Evertype, because of this behaviour as well. Apart from this any help is welcomed.


Anyone can take an article to AfD. Don't delete these templates again please. They simply mean that an editor does not believe an article meets our policies and guidelines, and this is the process to see if they do. Dougweller (talk) 10:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
OK! Please follow Evertype's activity as well.
Dougweller: Have you checked what Evertype is doing? No? And why not? Rovosaman (talk) 13:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rovosaman (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

Your reason here: Rovosaman is not same with Rovasscript. Check IPs Rovosaman (talk) 4:51 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

As Jeske points out quite well, below, meatpuppetry is not permitted. TNXMan 11:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

It is absolutely unfair. Please check IP-s. User Rovosaman is NOT same with user Rovasscript. The whole war is generated by Evertype who can not accept well established information (with references) about the Szekely-Hungarian Rovas, Carpathian Basin Rovas and Khazarian Rovas and Rovas Script Family, Rovas Atlas. It is vandalism, in two steps: (1) nominating for deletion instead of using Discussion pages, (2) blocking users who are not same. Please keep and follow Wikipedia rules. I propose to block user Evertype to stop vandalism against Hungarian-related scripts, because it is a personal issue. The core problem is that Evertype has not been able to write an acceptable Unicode proposal on Szekely-Hungarian rovas alternatively: Old Hungarian script since 1998... (N1686, remember?). That is 13 years. It is a shame, that followers of Evertype accept everything without any control. I need help to build Wikipedia pages following NPOV rules with other users (yes, with user rovasscript as well). I am open to discuss and accept any contributions, but do not delete, please.Rovosaman (talk) 08:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Part of the wonders of registering is that it hides your IP address. Also of interest may be WP:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppets, which states simply that any user found to behaving in a manner akin to a blocked user is to be sanctioned in the same way as the user he's emulating. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 10:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
"The term meatpuppet is derogatory and should be used with care, in keeping with Wikipedia's civility policy. Because of the processes above, it may be counterproductive to directly accuse someone of being a "meatpuppet", and doing so will often only inflame the dispute." I agree with this, I am not meatpuppet. Abuse is done by Evertype, not me. You (blockers) should read related Wiki policy.Rovosaman (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rovosaman (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

Not meatpuppet

Decline reason:

Please read the guide to appealing a block and try to avoid blaming others when arguing to be unblocked. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

It's clearly not just Evertype who sees a problem with your articles, and a problem with all the IPs (and different IP addresses do not prove different editors) and accounts suddenly popping up all defending you or attacking Evertype. This is clearly not spontaneous. Dougweller (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
So I have to wait? It is time to finish here - no more work for English Wiki. Bye.Rovosaman (talk) 20:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

For the record, I have in fact been able to write an acceptable Unicode proposal for Old Hungarian. -- Evertype· 23:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Rovas Scripts[edit]

Category:Rovas Scripts, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Evertype· 10:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)