Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pierre Price

Michael Pierre Price

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Michael Pierre Price (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not finding anything to substantiate the notability of this artist per WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG. The article is mainly referenced to primary sources from a group exhibition called "Techspressionism", in which he showed an artwork. An online BEFORE search finds lots of social media, and user-submitted content, and more primary sources. I found one good news source, [1] but that is not enough to put him over the bar, as what is needed are multiple, independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. WP:COI seems evident. Netherzone (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Visual arts, and Technology. Netherzone (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Games, Spirituality, Science, and Computing. Netherzone (talk) 00:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada, Arizona, Indiana, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails notability guidelines. Here's what I found:
  • this source as mentioned, it only describes the subject without anything in detail,
  • this source which reads more like a letter with a youtube embed that is basically an interview (and thus not secondary).
  • More interviews and profiles,
  • this source about one of his works in addition to a conversation with the subject (fails GNG),
  • another source which also doesn't meets GNG.

  I stopped analysing more but others are simply interviews and other non GNG passable sources. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 15:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 15:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
• keep [2] isn't hugely detailed, but it is non-trivial coverage. [3] in Arizona Daily Sun looks strong. His history with TSR should have some sources--if nothing else we have articles on a fair number of the things he's written. I tend to think that's strong evidence we should have an article on the creator. Hobit (talk) 00:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)