Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Stammel

Michael Stammel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small town mayor, meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:NPOL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is a lot of information on Mayor Michael Stammel. I worked hard on this article. He is also a prominent figure in the Capital Region of New York State, you can find many articles on the internet pertaining to him. There are articles about his political career, articles about him speaking about environmental issues in Rensselaer as well as other information. Why be so adamant about removing an informative article that someone put work in to? It has been on here for months with no issue. Dellis12144 (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfinished page for a local politician who fails WP:NPOL. If there is no consensus to delete, redirect to List of mayors of Rensselaer, New York. KidAd • SPEAK 18:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why are we not allowing the article to be placed in draft then so it can continue to be edited? There is no reason to delete and redirect. Dellis12144 (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The page has been moved to draftspace at Draft:Michael Stammel. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's move back now. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify since the page creator is open to improving the article there. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify since the article is a contender for being improved, it should be moved to draft space. There are plenty of valid sources on the internet for information on Michael Stammel that may be used. There is no reason to delete an article that has many reference sources available even if the subject is a representative of a smaller size community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dellis12144 (talk • contribs) 12:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If the page creator is willing to make changes to improve it should be sent to draft — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.194.179.229 (talk) 20:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dellis12144, the creator of the page, is known for editing and creating articles related to Rensselaer, New York and Rensselaer County. Given that the IP is located in that specific area, it is safe to assume that the user is editing as an IP in an attempt to sway this discussion in some way. KidAd • SPEAK 22:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you tagging me? I did post a comment: since the article is a contender for being improved, it should be moved to draft space. There are plenty of valid sources on the internet for information on Michael Stammel that may be used. There is no reason to delete an article that has many reference sources available even if the subject is a representative of a smaller size community. Dellis12144 (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]