Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Kumar Pandey

Vivek Kumar Pandey

Vivek Kumar Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A (so far) unremarkable scientist, the section "Responsibilities and research he carried out so far" in whose article is completely unsourced. What sourcing there is elsewhere in the article is somewhat desperate. I don't doubt that he was Honored by having his name included in list of "TOP 100 SCIENTISTS 2010" of International Biographical Centre (IBC), Sponsored & Administered by International Biographical Centre, Cambridge, England (an imprint of Melrose Press Ltd. Registered in England (No) 965274). Not written by, but perhaps related to, the User Dr. vivek Kumar Pandey (contributions). He's young; perhaps he will go far. Hoary (talk) 00:13, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 00:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

• Clear delete with a grand total of 2 cites on GS and at least one of those a self-cite! Xxanthippe (talk) 02:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC).
• Delete Nicely formatted, knows his wikimarkup. Unfortunately, that's not enough. --Crusio (talk) 07:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

• Keep the Artcle he is worthy of the wikipedia article and for his detail see the web link: . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.149.2 (talk • contribs)
• Keep Article about vivek pandey is good to find here. He has got proud of past honor Allahabad university in academic field in very early age among 42 members also IBC scientist 2010 award is going to make him notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.149.2 (talk • contribs)
• Do not delete Artcle is about the person who initiated his study from the place where was no facity at all for Oceanic Research. The Centre becomes the permanent centre of the university with Faculty in 2009 while enrollments in D.Phil was possible since begining. Pandey got first D.Phil from that centre which was not expected by this project mode centre due to local politics. Pandey worked on Indonesian Throughflow using POM model and became first on from India in the field.Dr. Pandey is not only academics, scientist but social and cultural person which is well know by most of the person. I gone through the wikibin page of Dr. Pandey and found him a Noble person of the world as comment described. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.83.245 (talk • contribs)
• Original and Notable Article It is not recreation but original article motivated from the wikibin article on Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey and near about 300 comments on the article. Kindly consider the influence of the wikibin article page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kook2011 (talk • contribs)
• Comment adding a {{reflist}}, so refs may show up - Nabla (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

• Keep it on the wikipedia I have read the reference and comment on wikibin of Dr. Pandey and found him notable. added by 117.199.146.116 (contributions)
• Delete per nom and Crusio. Beagel (talk) 11:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
• Quite notable person Keep the article as permanent article of wikipedia. I found no doubt on Dr. Pandey's Notablity. Added by 117.199.144.213 (contributions)
• Comment If this piece at "Wikibin" is "Pandey's major reference", as Kook2011 claims, then Pandey is in trouble. It's pretty easy for anyone to have an article there. As for the comments on the Wikibin article, they're hilarious (where they're comprehensible). -- Hoary (talk) 13:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
• keep it The article is notable according the wikibin comment. Dear Hoary why pandey in trouble. Please do not spread such words. Added by 117.199.149.232 (contributions)
• Delete, only an Assistant Professor, minimal citability in GScholar, fails WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - THere are bunch of sockpuppets here uh? He fails WP:PROF, Wikipedia is not a curriculum vitae and he has no impact or has reached controversy enough to meet the GNG, the references provided are academical however my major's tutor has greater number of scientific published articles, but this isn't a reason why I should create his article. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 15:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)