Rohilla dynasty
| Rohilla dynasty | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Country | |
| Founded | 1721 |
| Founder | Nawab Ali Mohammad Khan Bahadur Rohilla |
| Titles | |
| Deposition | 1947 (in Rampur State) |
| Cadet branches |
|
The Rohilla dynasty was a dynasty that ruled over much of North-West Uttar Pradesh in the form of Rohilkhand[3][4] and later until 1947, the Princely state of Rampur. At the height of their power the dynasty ruled over the Kingdom of Rohilkhand and held suzairnty over the Kingdom of Kumaon and Kingdom of Garhwhal.[5][6][7][8]
The Nawabs of Rampur eliminated communal violence during their reign, even when there was wide spread ethnic cleansing of Muslim subjects in the states of Sikh States, Alwar and Bharatpur during the Partition Riots, widely believed to have been ordered by their rulers. The Nawab on the other hand, strictly forbade his nobles from committing reprisal attacks against non-Muslims.[9][10][11]
Origin
Rohillas are Pashtuns by descent who migrated to north India during the 17th and 18th centuries. However, the Rohilla dynasty descended from the founder of the Kingdom of Rohilkhand, Nawab Ali Muhammed Khan, who was a Jat[12][13][14][15] boy of age of eight when he was adopted by the chief of the Barech tribe, Sardar Daud Khan Rohilla.[13] He became the Rohilla chief after the death of his foster father, Daud Khan. Due to the role he played in the establishment of Rohilkhand and in the general history of Rohillas, he gained recognition as a Rohilla chief, although he was not Afghan by birth.[15]
History
The dynasty rose to prominence with the first nawab of Rohilkhand, Nawab Ali Mohammad Khan.
Formation
Ali Mohammed Khan attracted many Afghan adventurers by virtue of his great reputation and became the most powerful man in Katehir. Conscious of his own power and the failing state of the Mughal Empire, he neglected imperial mandates and irregularly paid tax to the central government. Using the income from his lands to raise troops, purchase artillery and military stores and curry favour with political persons of interest, he used the same tactic to gain favour with the lower rungs of society. By his invasion of Nadir Shah in 1739 he strengthened his position, with many Afghans joining him. By 1740 he was officially recognised by the Emperor Muhammad Shah as governor. For the subsequent five years, his authority was unchallenged.
In 1745 a quarrel arose between Ali Mohammed and Safdar Jang, the subedar of Oudh. Ali's retainers seized the property of servants belonging to Safdar. Safdar was already jealous at Ali's growing power. He went to Emperor Muhammad Shah, and through him ordered the return of the confiscated property as well as the arrest of the Rohillas in charge of the confiscation. After Ali's refusal, Safdar led an imperial expedition together with the emperor. Ali's men deserted and he was captured and taken to Delhi.
He was treated respectfully by the emperor, in large part due to his influence among his many adherents. Ali was propitiated by an appointment as Governor of Sirhind (the area between Jummuna and Sutlej).
In 1748 an invasion by Ahmed Shah Abidali allowed Ali the opportunity to return to Katehir and re-establish his rule. Upon his return, he was rejoined by most of his men and became virtually independent in his control of Rohilkhand. To ensure loyalty almost all positions of power were given to Afghan and several including Najib-ad-daula received land grants.[16]
Second generation
On his deathbed, Ali Mohammad anointed his foster uncle Rehmat Khan as "Hafiz" (protector) of Rohilkhand and Dundi Khan as Chief of Army. He had already planned the division of his realm among his sons and received Rehmat Khan and Dundi Khan's solemn oaths that they would execute his will and protect the interests of his children. A council was created of the Rohilla chiefs in part to keep a check on Rehmat Khan and Dundi Khan and to provide a government that would safeguard Rohilkhand from invasion. All carried out solemn promises to carry out their duty, but they all reneged and sought to establish their own autonomy. This led to a confederation-like structure of government with the nawab of Rohilkhand at its head and the Rohilla chiefs in charge of individual Rohilla states answering to him, especially in regards to military engagements.[17]
Ali's realm was divided in such a way so as to create discord. Nawab Abdullah Khan and Nawab Murtaza Khan were given shared rule over Badaun. Nawab Alah Yar Khan and Nawab Saadullah Khan were given shared rule over Moradabad, Nawab Faizullah Khan was given rule over Rampur and Nawab Muhammad Yar Khan was given rule over Barielly.[18][19] In 1754 Hafiz Rehmat Khan orchestrated an argument within the royal family and used it as a pretext to usurp the power and wealth of the orphans. Disgusted, Muhammad Yar Khan along with his older brother Abdullah Khan and younger brother Allah Yar Khan left for Oojanee.[20] Nawab Alah Yar Khan died of consumption, and Nawab Murtaza Khan left for Secunderabad, where he died. Nawab Saadullah Khan was appointed nawab of Rohilkhand. Later, Nawab Abdullah Khan and Nawab Muhammad Yar Khan were granted land again. Nawab Muhammad Yar Khan was given rule over Aonla, and his court at Tandah was famed for poets such as Qaim and Mushafi.[21]
Relations with the British
The dynasty was highly regarded by the British for their "determined bravery". The Rohilla Wars were the most costly for the British against any Indian kingdom. The ensuing guerrilla war forced the British to grant the Rohillas a princely state wheresoever they willed, leading to the creation of Rampur.[22] Their bravery, tolerance and progressive rule gained them admiration. They were called upon by the British for aid in the Anglo-French Wars. Burke described the Rohillas as "the bravest, the most honourable and generous" and the nawab of Rampur became the first Indian sovereign to meet Queen Victoria along with several other European monarchs.[23]
Dynastic relations
It is probably a branch of the influential Barha dynasty best known as de facto ruling Mughal empire during the early 18th century.[24][25][26] In the 19th century, descendants of Ali Mohammed Khan, specifically the Nawabs of Rampur, made disputed claims that he was a Barha Sayyid and began the usage the title of Sayyid. However, they could not present any pedigree or valid historical proof in the support of this claim.[14] The Nawabs even sought service of a prominent religious leader of Rampur, Najmul Ghani for establishing ancestry from Ali, which was widely rejected.[27]
List of Rulers
Kingdom of Rohilkhand
| Nawab | Relation with previous Nawab | Rule | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formation of Kingdom of Rohilkhand | |||
| Nawab Ali Mohammed Khan |
Founder |
1721–1748 | |
| Nawab Abdullah Khan |
Son | 1748–1754 | |
| Nawab Saadullah Khan |
Brother | 1754–1764 | |
| Nawab Faizullah Khan |
Brother | 1764–1774 | |
| Conquest by Oudh. Green row signifies the regency of Hafiz Rahmat Ali Khan. | |||
Rampur State
| Nawab | Reign began | Reign ended | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formation of Rampur State after the First Rohilla War | |||
| Faizullah Khan | 15 September 1774 | 24 July 1793 | |
| Muhammad Ali Khan Bahadur | 24 July 1793 | 11 August 1793 | |
| Ghulam Muhammad Khan Bahadur | 11 August 1793 | 24 October 1794 | |
| Ahmad Ali Khan Bahadur | 24 October 1794 | 5 July 1840 | |
| Nasrullah Khan – Regent | 24 October 1794 | 1811 | |
| Muhammad Said Khan Bahadur | 5 July 1840 | 1 April 1855 | |
| Yusef Ali Khan Bahadur | 1 April 1855 | 21 April 1865 | |
| Kalb Ali Khan Bahadur | 21 April 1865 | 23 March 1887 | |
| Muhammad Mushtaq Ali Khan Bahadur | 23 March 1887 | 25 February 1889 | |
| Hamid Ali Khan Bahadur | 25 February 1889 | 20 June 1930 | |
| Regency | 25 February 1889 | 4 April 1894 | |
| Raza Ali Khan Bahadur | 20 June 1930 | 6 March 1966 | |
| Murtaza Ali Khan Bahadur – Titular | 6 March 1966 | 8 February 1982 | |
| Independence and accession to Indian Union | |||
References
- ^ Hāṇḍā, Omacanda. History of Uttaranchal. pp. 91–92.
- ^ Hāṇḍā, Omacanda. History of Uttaranchal. pp. 91–92.
- ^ Hāṇḍā, Omacanda. History of Uttaranchal. pp. 91–92.
- ^ and Gunjan Sharma, Himanshu Kifaltia. A Comprehensive Study of UTTARAKHAND.
- ^ Hāṇḍā, Omacanda. History of Uttaranchal. pp. 91–92.
- ^ and Gunjan Sharma, Himanshu Kifaltia. A Comprehensive Study of UTTARAKHAND.
- ^ Abel, W.C. (1911). "Gazetteer of Rampur". Imperial Gazetteer of India: 81.
- ^ Khan, Muhammad Najm-ul-Ghani (1918). Akhbar-us-Sanadeed, vol. 1. Lucknow: Munshi Nawal Kishore.
- ^ Saxena, Naresh Chandra. What Ails the IAS and Why It Fails to Deliver: An Insider's View. pp. Chapter 7.
- ^ Brennan, Lance (3 June 2009). "A Case of Attempted Segmental Modernization: Rampur State, 1930–1939". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 23 (3): 350–381. doi:10.1017/S0010417500013414. S2CID 144043634.
- ^ Copland, I. State, Community and Neighbourhood in Princely North India, c. 1900-1950. p. 140.
- ^ Irvine, W. (1971). Later Mughal. Atlantic Publishers & Distri. p. 118. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
Once Daud was sent against the village of Bankauli, in pargana Chaumahla, with which his employer was at feud. Along with the plunder taken on this occasion Daud obtained possession of a Jat boy seven or eight years of age, whom he caused to be circumcised and then adopted under the name of Ali Muhammad Khan.
- ^ a b Ḥusain, M.; Pakistan Historical Society (1957). A History of the Freedom Movement: 1707-1831. A History of the Freedom Movement: Being the Story of Muslim Struggle for the Freedom of Hind-Pakistan, 1707-1947. Pakistan Historical Society. p. 304. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
Amongst other prisoners he obtained a young Jat boy of eight years . Daud took a fancy to him and adopted him as his son and named him ' Ali Muhammad Khan.
- ^ a b Gommans, Jos J. L. (1995). The Rise of the Indo-Afghan Empire: C. 1710-1780. BRILL. p. 120. ISBN 978-90-04-10109-8.
Most of the contemporary sources, however, call him a Jat or an Ahir.
- ^ a b Strachey, Sir John (1892). Hastings and the Rohilla War. Clarendon Press. p. 11.
...this remarkable chief was not an Afghan by birth, but a Hindu, a Jat by caste.
- ^ Strachey, Sir John (1892). Hastings and the Rohilla War. Clarendon Press, Oxford University. p. 10–14.
- ^ Hamilton, Charles. An Historical Relation of the origin, progress and final dissolution of the Rohilla Afghans in the northern provinces of Hindostan. pp. 90–92.
- ^ Hamilton, Charles. An Historical Relation of the rise and fall of the Rohilla Afghan in the Northern Provinces of India. p. 90.
- ^ Strachey, Sir John (1892). Warren Hastings and the Rohillas. p. 19.
- ^ Hamilton, Charles. An Historical Relation of the rise and fall of the Rohilla Afghan in the Northern Provinces of India. p. 93.
- ^ "Qayem Chaandpuri - Profile & Biography".
- ^ Prasad, Alok (2011). "The Rohilla 'revolution' of 1794". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 72: 663–669. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44146759.
- ^ "How a Nawab humiliated his proud Begum on Nauroz in Rampur". www.dailyo.in.
- ^ Lethbridge, Sir Robert. The Golden Handbook. p. 455.
- ^ Kazim, Syed. "A critical study of the role and achievements of Sayyid brothers". Shodhganga: 22. hdl:10603/52425.
- ^ Khan, Reaz Ahmed. "Afghans and Shaikhzadas in the nobility of Shah Jahan". Shodhganga: 15.
- ^ Srivastava, Ashirbadi Lal. The First Two Nawabs Of Oudh. p. 103. Retrieved 17 January 2023.
Contemporary Persian authorities say that Ali Muhammad Khan was of Jat parents . See Gulistan . 7 ; Abdulkarim . 88b ; Ashob . 424 ; Siyar II . 480. A partisan attempt has, however, been made in morden times to prove that he was a Sayyid. Najmul Ghani of Rampur has invented a false pedigree of the Khan , tracing it to Muhammad. The Maulvi's discussion is altogether unconvincing and thoroughly ridiculous. His object is to prove that the present ruler of Rampur is a Sayyid.