Jump to content

Comparison of subtitle editors

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jarble (talk | contribs) at 03:23, 15 August 2020 (added Category:Software comparisons using HotCat). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following table compares some characteristics of some subtitle editing software.

Name License Platform Multilanguage Audio waveform Formats supported Extra Information
Aegisub GPL (but code is ISC or BSD3c) Cross platform Yes Yes SSA/ASS, MicroDVD, .srt (Full support)
AdobeEncore, EBU STL (Write Only) JACOsub (Read Only)[1] 		Limited support for RTL languages. It's mainly used for creating ASS subtitles. Uses libass, making the ASS effects appear correctly in the internal media player.
Amara Proprietary, formerly GNU AGPL Cross platform Yes ? SRT, SSA, SBV, VTT, DFXP, ITT, SCC and CAP formats.[2] Cloud platform with subtitle editor and workflow tools for collaborative captioning and subtitling, including making corrections to machine-generated captions. Add-ons include automatic speech recognition.
Gnome Subtitles GPL Linux ? —
Subtitle Edit GPL Windows, Linux Yes Interactive 250+ Translate mode, spell check, OCR, batch convert, uses .NET Framework

See also

References

  1. ^ "SubtitleFormats – Aegisub". Archived from the original on 2014-07-23. Retrieved 2014-07-31.
  2. ^ "Subtitle formats available on Amara". Amara.org.


Stub icon

This article related to a type of software is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_subtitle_editors&oldid=973051479"