Aluminium Plant Podgorica
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
|Yury Moiseev (CEO)|
Number of employees
Construction of an aluminium smelter in Montenegro was first proposed in the 1960s, when significant quantities of high quality bauxite ore were discovered near Nikšić. With the support from Pechiney, construction of KAP began in 1969, while production of aluminium began in 1971.
The KAP produces its own alumina, extracting it out of the bauxite shipped from the Nikšić bauxite mine. The factory also has its own production of pre-baked anodes. The smelter has an installed capacity of 120,000 tons of liquid aluminum per year.
The plant had its most difficult times during UN-imposed economic sanctions on FR Yugoslavia. During the sanctions, the production was reduced to 13% of capacity. In the period 1997–1999 KAP participated with 8.2–6.7% in GDP of Montenegro, and 65–67% in export for the same period. Most of the time, the KAP acquired necessary raw materials and spare parts from Glencore. The entire export was also conducted by Glencore. The company was one of the few Montenegrin companies to recover after the breakup of Yugoslavia.
On December 1, 2005, KAP was privatized. 65.4394% shares were sold to Salomon Enterprises Limited (later renamed CEAC – Central European Aluminum Company), a company based in Cyprus, for €48.5 million and obligations to invest over €50 million in its modernization and environmental upgrade. CEAC is fully owned by En+ Group, and even the negotiations on the sale were conducted directly between Oleg Deripaska and the then Prime Minister of Montenegro, Milo Đukanović.
In May 2006, CEAC said, "various breaches of representations and warranties" of the deal were discovered by accountants Deloitte, including KAP having "hidden" debts and obligations towards the state totalling tens of millions of euros. In addition, the government-certified 2004 accounts were deemed inaccurate when it came to working capital and other assets. "It became evident to CEAC that KAP's initial financial situation had been misrepresented," the company claimed.
As of 2008[update], the KAP has struggled to survive the impact of ongoing economic crisis. The low trading price of aluminium, and expensive production inputs, primarily the electricity and alumina production, have resulted in KAP generating daily losses of up to €200,000. The company has been unable to survive ever since without the constant Government subsidies, primarily in writing off the debt for electricity.
In June 2009, the financial situation at the company had not improved, leaving KAP in danger of being closed by CEAC. The government, not wanting to see its largest company being shut down, agreed to guarantee a €45 million loan. In exchange, the government would receive half of the stakes owned by CEAC, leaving CEAC with a stake of 29.3%.
As relationship between Russian owners and management and the Government of Montenegro became increasingly sour, there is an ongoing debate within the country about the fate of the company. The size of the company, number of employees, and its impact on the Montenegrin trade balance imply that efforts will be made by the Government to keep the company alive, although sustainable ownership and management arrangements are yet to be made, given the current dissatisfaction with Russian owners. On Monday, 8 July 2013, KAP officially went bankrupt, having up to that point accumulated a debt of 383 million euros, while the company itself is worth 180 million euros.
Podgorica Aluminium Plant is subject to some controversy and criticism. Although it is the biggest single contributor to Montenegrin GDP and export, it is heavily criticized for polluting the fertile Zeta plain. KAP's red mud pond is notorious for its dry red dust, that is spread by the winds across the villages in Zeta.
KAP is also criticized for consuming most of the electrical power of Montenegro at low prices, while Montenegrin citizens face frequent shortages of electricity and pay for it at much higher prices.
Various political entities, most notably Movement for Changes, had pointed out that selling the KAP was a bad deal for the state of Montenegro. Arguments are that KAP was underpriced, and that the new owners have suspicious business practices, such as reporting constant annual losses, in order not to pay off dividends to the minority shareholders.
KAP's trade union has launched strikes frequently since privatization, demanding increases in wages. Strikes unfold in a tense atmosphere, as the KAP management hired a private security company whose armed personnel supervises the strikes.
- MacDonald, Neil (October 17, 2008). "Oligarch’s battle clouds an economy - FT.com". Financial Times. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
- Watson, Nicolas (December 12, 2013). "Russian oligarch suffers metal fatigue in Montenegro". Business New Eupore. Retrieved 12 December 2013.
- MacDonald, Neil (June 18, 2009). "Montenegro gives in to Deripaska - FT.com". Financial Times. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
- Savic, Misha (April 5, 2012). "Montenegro to Repay Deutsche Bank Loan to KAP - Bloomberg". Bloomberg L.P. Belgrade. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
- Savic, Misha (March 1, 2012). "Montenegro Set to Take Over KAP, Deripaska’s En+ Fights Back - Bloomberg". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved 12 September 2012.