Astolfo: Revision history

29 July 2024

• curprev 15:3915:39, 29 July 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 8,030 bytes +1,015‎ Undid revision 1237390635 by Merck238 (talk) revert persistent vandalism... undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 15:1515:15, 29 July 2024‎ Merck238 talk contribs‎ 7,015 bytes −1,015‎ Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit undo Tag: Reverted

23 July 2024

• curprev 16:2816:28, 23 July 2024‎ R.R. Blaze talk contribs‎ m 8,030 bytes +9‎ →‎Astolfo in Orlando Furioso undo
• curprev 14:5114:51, 23 July 2024‎ Anaxial talk contribs‎ 8,021 bytes +1,015‎ Reverted 1 edit by Merck238 (talk): Unexplained deletion undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 14:5114:51, 23 July 2024‎ Merck238 talk contribs‎ m 7,006 bytes −1,015‎ Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 13:4913:49, 23 July 2024‎ Trappist the monk talk contribs‎ 8,021 bytes −1,540‎ revert to last unbroken version; undo
• curprev 13:4313:43, 23 July 2024‎ R.R. Blaze talk contribs‎ m 9,561 bytes −8‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 11:5111:51, 23 July 2024‎ R.R. Blaze talk contribs‎ m 9,569 bytes +23‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:4008:40, 23 July 2024‎ 2a02:3033:202:deb4:18fc:d9fb:648e:b571 talk‎ 9,546 bytes +8‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 04:5004:50, 23 July 2024‎ KingRedwolf talk contribs‎ 9,538 bytes +1,503‎ →‎top undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
• curprev 04:4004:40, 23 July 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 8,035 bytes +1,545‎ Undid revision 1236108827 by Merck238 (talk) rv vandalism (blanking of sourced information pertinent to the subject) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 01:1101:11, 23 July 2024‎ R.R. Blaze talk contribs‎ m 6,490 bytes −5‎ →‎Astolfo in Orlando Furioso undo

22 July 2024

• curprev 23:2323:23, 22 July 2024‎ Merck238 talk contribs‎ 6,495 bytes −1,545‎ Mobile edit undo Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking

10 July 2024

• curprev 15:5715:57, 10 July 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 8,040 bytes +1,545‎ Undid revision 1233721405 by Damsen117 (talk) It's information backed by reliable sources and discussing the context of the historical figure and how they are overshadowed by a fictional counterpart in search results, which is valid to both subjects in question. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 15:1115:11, 10 July 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 6,495 bytes −1,545‎ I'm being real, you and people are forcing information into an article that has nothing to do with it, as i said multiple times, the only thing they share is their name, but that's about it, how would that be an interpretation of the same character "In modern times"? That doesn't make sense. And NOBODY here has argued me accordingly providing evidence that the character from Fate was based off of the original fictional character. And this is vandalism? If anything, the vandalism comes from you. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

9 July 2024

• curprev 02:4502:45, 9 July 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 8,040 bytes +1,545‎ Undid revision 1233440379 by Damsen117 (talk) okay I'm pretty certain you're using a sock puppet now... undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 02:2202:22, 9 July 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 6,495 bytes −1,545‎ Reverted suspected abuse of power without a concrete explanation. You're purposefully spreading misinformation. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

8 July 2024

• curprev 22:0522:05, 8 July 2024‎ RandomEditsForWhenIRemember talk contribs‎ 8,040 bytes +1,545‎ Undid revision 1233370241 by Merck238 (talk) - Reverted suspected vandalism undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 18:4318:43, 8 July 2024‎ Merck238 talk contribs‎ 6,495 bytes −1,545‎ I'm sorry, but how is that article piece relevant to Astolfo? This is quite literally misinformation. Plus, Fate's Astolfo has his own fandom wikipedia page. In any case, you're the one forcing it into the article because "You like it", if anything you're the one who should be reported for this. undo Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking

6 July 2024

• curprev 20:4020:40, 6 July 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 8,040 bytes +1,545‎ Undid revision 1233013956 by Damsen117 (talk) please stop removing reliable sources based on the grounds of WP:IDONTLIKEIT...it's still within due weight for the article undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 20:3820:38, 6 July 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 6,495 bytes −1,545‎ How is this vandalism? The information in question here is 100% unrelated to the article, it shouldn't be valid. Not because "i don't like it". undo Tag: Reverted

1 July 2024

• curprev 08:3708:37, 1 July 2024‎ 191.39.158.199 talk‎ 8,040 bytes +8‎ →‎In modern times undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 03:3403:34, 1 July 2024‎ 177.45.95.67 talk‎ 8,032 bytes +37‎ →‎In modern times undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

29 June 2024

• curprev 17:1817:18, 29 June 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 7,995 bytes +972‎ Undid revision 1231673053 by Damsen117 (talk) rv vandalism. Please do not remove valid, sourced content from the article. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it can't be included. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 16:0816:08, 29 June 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,023 bytes −972‎ Because anyone has yet to answer it. Meanwhile, keep the miss-information out of this. undo Tag: Reverted

25 June 2024

• curprev 05:4205:42, 25 June 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 7,995 bytes +27‎ →‎In modern times undo
• curprev 05:4105:41, 25 June 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 7,968 bytes −22‎ →‎In modern times: Same ref for the whole paragraph, no need to list multiple times undo
• curprev 05:3905:39, 25 June 2024‎ Kung Fu Man talk contribs‎ 7,990 bytes +953‎ Undid revision 1230227522 by Damsen117 (talk) For all purposes this is no different than discussions about fictional adaptations of other characters i.e. Robin Hood or King Arthur, and for the purposes of the article is valid due to the discussions regarding the "Astolfo Effect" on public perception of a historical figure. undo

21 June 2024

• curprev 13:4513:45, 21 June 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −964‎ Again, where's proof of that? Where did the mangakas state that? The only thing they have in common is literally the name. The original Astolfo isn't some pink haired femboy. undo Tag: Undo

18 June 2024

• curprev 18:2118:21, 18 June 2024‎ 5.173.74.65 talk‎ 8,001 bytes +964‎ Dante in DMC is unrelated, but this is supposed to be the same character undo Tags: Undo Reverted

17 June 2024

• curprev 23:5923:59, 17 June 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −964‎ That's not why i did that. It's because its not a portrayal to the original character. As i said, the only thing they share is their name and that's it. There's no evidence from the mangakas that they based the character off of him. That's like saying that Dante from Devil May Cry was based from Dante Alighieri, and he doesn't even show up in his wiki. So where's consistency? undo Tags: Undo Reverted

8 June 2024

• curprev 22:4322:43, 8 June 2024‎ KingRedwolf talk contribs‎ 8,001 bytes +964‎ Undid revision, just because you don't like the character doesn't mean that it's unimportant 1227494339 by Damsen117 (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted

6 June 2024

• curprev 01:5501:55, 6 June 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −964‎ Undid revision 1227448005 by KingRedwolf (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted

5 June 2024

• curprev 19:4419:44, 5 June 2024‎ KingRedwolf talk contribs‎ 8,001 bytes +964‎ Undid revision 1227122332 by Damsen117 (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted

3 June 2024

• curprev 21:0621:06, 3 June 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −964‎ With zero resemblance of a ridiculous anime character with childish design. The only thing they share is the name. You only picked my weakest argument and left out the rest. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

2 June 2024

• curprev 08:0908:09, 2 June 2024‎ 94.254.144.219 talk‎ 8,001 bytes +964‎ it's not any "historical figure", it's a fictional character undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 01:0401:04, 2 June 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −964‎ That's not true, there is no explicit mention that the character was inspired by the historical figure. Plus, its a disservice to his character as he didn't have any inclination and/or style to being a femboy. Popularity is irrelevant, there are countless of historical figures who also share a name with other popular characters and yet aren't even mentioned in their wikis. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted section blanking

31 May 2024

• curprev 23:2723:27, 31 May 2024‎ KingRedwolf talk contribs‎ m 8,001 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 23:2623:26, 31 May 2024‎ KingRedwolf talk contribs‎ m 8,000 bytes −45‎ removed unnecessary information undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 01:3801:38, 31 May 2024‎ Nalydac talk contribs‎ 8,045 bytes +1,008‎ Undid revision 1226299517 by Damsen117 (talk) Section is for references in 'other media'. The Astolfo from fate is explicitly based on the original, and his popularity from this incarnation warrants a mention. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

29 May 2024

• curprev 19:3119:31, 29 May 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −1,008‎ Yes there is. The character from Fade has nothing to do with this historical figure other than sharing a name. Also, the original Astolfo isn't an anime femboy. undo Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking

26 May 2024

• curprev 12:3012:30, 26 May 2024‎ Prince of Erebor talk contribs‎ m 8,045 bytes −3‎ Reverted edits by 2A02:C7C:36F6:C300:65C1:DE7D:3201:55E8 (talk) (AV) undo Tags: AntiVandal Rollback
• curprev 12:2912:29, 26 May 2024‎ 2a02:c7c:36f6:c300:65c1:de7d:3201:55e8 talk‎ 8,048 bytes +3‎ name change undo Tags: Reverted possible vandalism

16 May 2024

• curprev 23:2423:24, 16 May 2024‎ RandomEditsForWhenIRemember talk contribs‎ 8,045 bytes +1,008‎ Undid revision 1221289932 by Damsen117 (talk) - No need for this to be removed + no reasoning given undo Tags: Undo Reverted

15 May 2024

• curprev 12:4012:40, 15 May 2024‎ 85.76.109.4 talk‎ 7,037 bytes −21‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Manual revert

14 May 2024

• curprev 23:4723:47, 14 May 2024‎ 174.53.69.162 talk‎ 7,058 bytes +21‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

29 April 2024

• curprev 01:0801:08, 29 April 2024‎ Damsen117 talk contribs‎ 7,037 bytes −1,008‎ Undid revision 1219642132 by Nalydac (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted section blanking

23 April 2024

• curprev 22:5322:53, 23 April 2024‎ 142.167.250.217 talk‎ 8,045 bytes −9‎ Undid revision 1220462225 by 75.88.38.106 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 22:3722:37, 23 April 2024‎ 75.88.38.106 talk‎ 8,054 bytes +9‎ Made it better undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

19 April 2024

• curprev 00:0900:09, 19 April 2024‎ Nalydac talk contribs‎ 8,045 bytes +1,008‎ Undid revision 1219317260 by Damsen117 (talk) Removing references about Astolfo's most well known modern portrayal is unnecessary. Many wikipedia articles of mythological or historical figures have sections regarding their modern portrayals and Astolfo is hardly an exception. undo Tags: Undo Reverted