This category is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This question is outside my area of knowledge, but I'll blunder on anyway. The articles Concurrent computing and Parallel computing explain the differences. As I understand it, parallel is a subset of concurrent (which, if we follow that logic, the parallel cat should be a subcat of the concurrent cat). Both categories have enough entries to justify keeping both. I suspect that a good number of the articles in the parallel cat don't fit the strict definition and should be moved to concurrent. My preference is to keep both, unless proper catting reveals there are only a handful left in parallel. There are enough people on WP who follow these fields that hopefully they will weigh in and correct me. JonHarder17:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
