Category talk:Wikipedia requested images of birds

Wikipedia requested images of birds is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

There are at least two problems with this category: 1) There are bird articles that clearly have no photo and need one (are there any that don't) that have not been included. 2) There are also many that do have photos yet are included. Surely this sort of work can be greatly sped up by a bot. Richard001 (talk) 01:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, 11 years later. This category page is basically useless until these tags get cleaned up (ideally with a bot, since it will be a lot of work otherwise). According to the Image Existence Checker tool, some 3,500 of the 5,000 or so pages listed here do indeed have images. Manual spot checking appears to confirm this. GeoEvan (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]