Jump to content

Cavendish experiment: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

19 May 2024

24 April 2024

18 April 2024

28 January 2024

19 January 2024

  • curprev 03:4903:49, 19 January 2024JamesRiordon talk contribsm 22,197 bytes +1 Added a space in the text before the location of the reference info for citation [24] undo
  • curprev 03:4403:44, 19 January 2024JamesRiordon talk contribs 22,196 bytes +333 Cavendish's value for the desnity of the Earth of 5.448 times the density of water suggests a value of G=6.74e-11, not 6.674e-11. The value of 6.674e-11 is not 1% different from the accepted value, as claimed in the text. I can show the math for Cavendish's value based on his measurement of the density of the Earth, if needed, or you can see this reference for the 6.74e-11 value. undo
  • curprev 03:2803:28, 19 January 2024JamesRiordon talk contribs 21,863 bytes −1 Cavendish's value for the desnity of the Earth of 5.448 times the density of water suggests a value of G=6.74e-11, not 6.674e-11 undo

27 December 2023

15 December 2023

4 December 2023

22 November 2023

  • curprev 19:4719:47, 22 November 2023AnomieBOT talk contribs 21,757 bytes +395 Rescuing orphaned refs ("HarvLect" from rev 1186366170) undo
  • curprev 17:3517:35, 22 November 202324.4.107.105 talk 21,362 bytes −2,572 What reasons? The above text points out the surprising accuracy of the measurement. There is only one objection, which is repeated multiple times namely that the original purpose of the experiment was not precisely what we refer to as G. A simple re-normalization of his result to factor for the density of Earth produces G. Please see my other edit here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cavendish_experiment&diff=1186366170&oldid=1177879527 undo Tag: references removed
  • curprev 17:2217:22, 22 November 202324.4.107.105 talk 23,934 bytes +11 This heading makes it almost disrespectful to Cavendish. Simply rearrangements or derivations of his result does not mean that he was not first to discover this fundamental constant of the universe and indeed by a great accuracy. Imagine someone making an edit to the effect that maybe Einstein didn't really discover Relativity since he was a clerk at a patent office regularly reviewing the latest scientific discoveries of others: "Whether Einstein discovered Relativity", equally dispossessing. undo

30 September 2023

28 September 2023

15 August 2023

10 August 2023

25 June 2023

4 April 2023

7 March 2023

6 January 2023

24 November 2022

7 October 2022

1 October 2022

28 August 2022

16 June 2022

4 June 2022

3 June 2022

2 June 2022

28 May 2022

27 May 2022

21 May 2022

12 May 2022

1 May 2022

30 April 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)