Jump to content

Doom (film): Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

2 July 2024

27 June 2024

19 June 2024

31 May 2024

21 February 2024

3 January 2024

26 December 2023

25 December 2023

16 December 2023

4 October 2023

  • curprev 22:3722:37, 4 October 202394.175.5.141 talk 33,256 bytes −825 →‎Other responses: Doug Walker isn't notable enough of a critic to get an entire paragraph dedicated to his opinion of the film. Plus, the Nostalgia Critic is a comedy show, and often exaggerates criticisms and aspects of the film for comedic effect, which makes it not serious criticism to be cited. undo

28 August 2023

27 August 2023

17 August 2023

2 August 2023

28 June 2023

8 May 2023

15 April 2023

12 April 2023

4 April 2023

24 March 2023

23 March 2023

21 March 2023

16 March 2023

11 March 2023

10 March 2023

7 March 2023

27 February 2023

  • curprev 09:0009:00, 27 February 2023AnomieBOT talk contribs 33,779 bytes +197 Rescuing orphaned refs ("Doom - Nostalgia Critic" from rev 1139134580) undo
  • curprev 06:4806:48, 27 February 2023145.8.179.205 talk 33,582 bytes −1,842 Trimmed down the description of Nostalgia critics review, which was way too long. When citing a reviewer on wikipedia (eg Roger Ebert), the standard is to give just a very brief synopsis of that reviewer's opinion, either by way of closing statement, or one or two brief quotes that adequately sum up the review. Not a full description of NC's youtube video that is almost longer than the plot synopsis of the movie itself. undo Tag: references removed

13 February 2023

21 January 2023

20 January 2023

18 January 2023

28 December 2022

15 December 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)