Talk:BitGo

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cryptocurrency Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptocurrency, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cryptocurrency on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptocurrencyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptocurrencyTemplate:WikiProject CryptocurrencyWikiProject Cryptocurrency articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

September 2018 Cleanup

Rresponse to message left on my talkpage @Audacity: I certainly can respect the funding round being in there. I would suggest that only one of those four sources is needed though to support it. Because of 1RR I am reluctant to make that change myself but think you could without running into DS issues. The Hack section is definitely better. At this point is the first paragraph needed at all? Also it seems like It is likely that the hacker obtained the signing key of Bitfinex and started sending withdrawal signing requests to BitGo, which blindly processed the transactions without further checks. is controversial enough that it needs its own source otherwise it should be removed. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:29, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Barkeep49: Thanks for the suggestions. I made some changes accordingly - take a look. Cheers, Λυδ α cιτγ 03:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Audacity: Works for me. Thanks and Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]