Jump to content

Moral absolutism: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 October 2023

24 September 2023

1 August 2023

2 June 2023

25 April 2023

3 February 2023

2 February 2023

10 July 2022

28 June 2022

19 April 2022

27 February 2022

20 October 2021

14 September 2021

21 May 2021

14 February 2021

24 November 2020

26 October 2020

25 October 2020

3 October 2020

10 September 2020

27 May 2020

24 November 2019

15 November 2019

12 November 2019

  • curprev 09:3309:33, 12 November 20192606:a000:111f:8929:e066:3abd:34b1:e1f6 talk 3,943 bytes −37 This is a critical change -- absolutism does not hold that ALL actions are right or wrong. The evidence for this is lower in the article, the Pojman definition. He says there is "at least one principle" (i.e., at least one category of actions) that is always right or wrong. Also in no way should this doctrine be associated with political conservatism in the united states; plenty of liberals would hold that murder is absolutely wrong, for example. undo

10 July 2019

29 April 2019

26 February 2019

24 October 2018

19 August 2018

10 March 2018

18 February 2018

17 February 2018

22 September 2017

7 March 2017

3 February 2017

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)