Naturalistic fallacy: Revision history

14 September 2011

• curprev 22:0922:09, 14 September 2011‎ Memills talk contribs‎ m 13,318 bytes +5‎ →‎The is–ought problem: link to moralistic fallacy undo

23 August 2011

• curprev 18:3918:39, 23 August 2011‎ RJC talk contribs‎ 13,313 bytes −746‎ Reverted 1 edit by Hendrikgommer (talk): Promoting self-published book. (TW) undo
• curprev 17:4117:41, 23 August 2011‎ Hendrikgommer talk contribs‎ 14,059 bytes +746‎ →‎Terminology undo

6 August 2011

• curprev 14:1114:11, 6 August 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 13,313 bytes −1,380‎ Appeal to nature - stealing this section for the Appeal to Nature article. Hope this is ok. undo
• curprev 12:4812:48, 6 August 2011‎ JorisvS talk contribs‎ m 14,693 bytes +8‎ dashes undo

5 July 2011

• curprev 19:2119:21, 5 July 2011‎ Ed416 talk contribs‎ m 14,685 bytes −1‎ No edit summary undo

17 May 2011

• curprev 20:0020:00, 17 May 2011‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ m 14,686 bytes +9‎ [344]+: issue. undo

12 May 2011

• curprev 21:2221:22, 12 May 2011‎ JimWae talk contribs‎ m 14,677 bytes −46‎ Reverted edits by 142.55.214.50 (talk) to last version by Tesseract2 undo
• curprev 21:1821:18, 12 May 2011‎ 142.55.214.50 talk‎ 14,723 bytes +46‎ No edit summary undo

19 April 2011

• curprev 03:0003:00, 19 April 2011‎ Tesseract2 talk contribs‎ 14,677 bytes +18‎ better ordering, i think undo

9 April 2011

• curprev 03:1703:17, 9 April 2011‎ 71.237.133.57 talk‎ 14,659 bytes −1,100‎ false information removed undo Tag: section blanking
• curprev 03:1503:15, 9 April 2011‎ 71.237.133.57 talk‎ 15,759 bytes −62‎ additional information undo
• curprev 03:0703:07, 9 April 2011‎ 71.237.133.57 talk‎ 15,821 bytes −636‎ Corrected information pertaining to what the notion, which preceeds Moore entails undo

30 March 2011

• curprev 19:0419:04, 30 March 2011‎ 67.211.118.30 talk‎ 16,457 bytes +223‎ →‎Science and moral questions undo
• curprev 18:5518:55, 30 March 2011‎ 67.211.118.30 talk‎ 16,234 bytes +352‎ Undid revision 420645614 by Lisnabreeny (talk) undo

29 March 2011

• curprev 09:5009:50, 29 March 2011‎ FrescoBot talk contribs‎ m 15,882 bytes −23‎ Bot: links syntax undo

25 March 2011

• curprev 11:5611:56, 25 March 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,905 bytes −75‎ Undid revision 420494528 . I dont believe Sam Harris ever argued such. Citation please. undo

24 March 2011

• curprev 14:3014:30, 24 March 2011‎ 67.211.118.30 talk‎ 15,980 bytes +75‎ →‎Science and moral questions undo

16 March 2011

• curprev 00:2500:25, 16 March 2011‎ Gnofs talk contribs‎ m 15,905 bytes +5‎ →‎Appeal to nature undo

8 March 2011

• curprev 13:1713:17, 8 March 2011‎ Chris Capoccia talk contribs‎ m 15,900 bytes +226‎ →‎Terminology undo
• curprev 13:0913:09, 8 March 2011‎ Chris Capoccia talk contribs‎ m 15,674 bytes +5‎ →‎Further reading undo
• curprev 13:0513:05, 8 March 2011‎ Chris Capoccia talk contribs‎ m 15,669 bytes +32‎ →‎Further reading undo
• curprev 13:0413:04, 8 March 2011‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ m 15,637 bytes +249‎ Citations: [262]+: isbn, journal, volume, last2, first2, last3, first3. Tweaked: title, year, first1, last1. Chris Capoccia undo
• curprev 13:0313:03, 8 March 2011‎ Chris Capoccia talk contribs‎ m 15,388 bytes +41‎ {{Morefootnotes|article|date=March 2011}} undo
• curprev 13:0213:02, 8 March 2011‎ Chris Capoccia talk contribs‎ 15,347 bytes −127‎ reformatted using citation templates undo

1 March 2011

• curprev 02:0402:04, 1 March 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,474 bytes +20‎ So demonstrate the reasons in the talk page, where it is already demonstrated this may not be a formal fallacy undo

28 February 2011

• curprev 23:2323:23, 28 February 2011‎ 76.164.161.199 talk‎ 15,454 bytes −20‎ It's not just "claimed to be" a logical fallacy, it is a logical fallacy for demonstrable reasons. undo

27 February 2011

• curprev 22:4222:42, 27 February 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,474 bytes −45‎ →‎Appeal to nature: removed the contended "may" or "may or may not" wording regarding the outcome of certin debates, entirely. undo
• curprev 22:3722:37, 27 February 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,519 bytes +75‎ →‎See also undo

8 February 2011

• curprev 00:0000:00, 8 February 2011‎ Machine Elf 1735 talk contribs‎ 15,444 bytes −11‎ Undid revision 412568344 by Lisnabreeny (talk) WP:BRD Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy article has nothing about homosexuality etc undo

7 February 2011

• curprev 18:1618:16, 7 February 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,455 bytes +11‎ →‎For one > The Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy. (see talk) undo
• curprev 09:5009:50, 7 February 2011‎ 94.194.86.160 talk‎ 15,444 bytes −11‎ →‎Appeal to nature: 'may not'. Who exactly is disputing that the appeal to nature fallacy is fallacious? undo
• curprev 09:4709:47, 7 February 2011‎ 94.194.86.160 talk‎ 15,455 bytes +26‎ →‎Appeal to nature: If the main article exists it needs to be linked undo
• curprev 09:4509:45, 7 February 2011‎ 94.194.86.160 talk‎ 15,429 bytes +296‎ re-included removed paragraph. Unattributed statement ('not intended' by whom exactly?). Contrast with moralistic fallacy important and needs to be included in lede. undo
• curprev 09:3709:37, 7 February 2011‎ 94.194.86.160 talk‎ 15,133 bytes −41‎ Moore never stated this. In Principia Ethica he talks in detail about Herbert Spencer's fallacious use of evolution. Changing this to 'comfortable' makes no sense whatsoever. undo
• curprev 00:4100:41, 7 February 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,174 bytes −275‎ undid anon unsupported & undiscussed npov edits undo

6 February 2011

• curprev 20:5820:58, 6 February 2011‎ 94.194.86.160 talk‎ 15,449 bytes +275‎ rv recent POV edits. undo

5 February 2011

• curprev 17:2717:27, 5 February 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ m 15,174 bytes −426‎ →‎Intro, removed my own unnecessarily correctional paragraph undo
• curprev 16:4716:47, 5 February 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ m 15,600 bytes −27‎ →‎Appeal to nature - removed main article link, which has been redirected to here undo
• curprev 06:5106:51, 5 February 2011‎ Jweiss11 talk contribs‎ m 15,627 bytes −1‎ spacing undo

29 January 2011

• curprev 17:0817:08, 29 January 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ m 15,628 bytes +19‎ →‎intro:clarification - another adjustment undo
• curprev 06:3006:30, 29 January 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,609 bytes +31‎ →‎reworking intro/guidance undo
• curprev 05:2705:27, 29 January 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,578 bytes +50‎ →‎couple of small edits in intro undo
• curprev 02:0302:03, 29 January 2011‎ Lisnabreeny talk contribs‎ 15,528 bytes +79‎ →‎corrected alternative use of phrase note, see talk undo

9 January 2011

• curprev 00:5500:55, 9 January 2011‎ Nightscream talk contribs‎ m 15,449 bytes +4‎ ce undo
• curprev 00:5500:55, 9 January 2011‎ Nightscream talk contribs‎ m 15,445 bytes −1‎ →‎Terminology: ce undo

19 December 2010

• curprev 02:3602:36, 19 December 2010‎ 69.145.80.13 talk‎ 15,446 bytes −87‎ →‎Appeal to nature undo

11 December 2010

• curprev 10:0510:05, 11 December 2010‎ 70.247.64.190 talk‎ 15,533 bytes +1‎ →‎Appeal to nature undo
• curprev 10:0510:05, 11 December 2010‎ 70.247.64.190 talk‎ 15,532 bytes +9‎ →‎Appeal to nature undo

25 November 2010

• curprev 19:5519:55, 25 November 2010‎ 97.116.39.227 talk‎ 15,523 bytes −26‎ It's my understanding that Wikipedia doesn't require two spaces between sentences. undo