Jump to content

Navalnyy v. Russia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Navalnyy v Russia
CourtEuropean Court of Human Rights
Citation[2018] ECHR 1062, (2018) 29580/12, (2019) 68 EHRR 25
Keywords
Freedom of association, liberty and the right to a fair trial

Navalnyy v Russia [2018] ECHR 1062 is a human rights law case, concerning freedom of association, liberty and the right to a fair trial.[1] It centered around Alexei Navalny, a Russian opposition activist.[2]

Facts

[edit]

Alexei Navalny, an activist against corruption and a blogger, was arrested seven times between 2012 and 2014 for a rally, three 'walkabout' gatherings, two demonstrations, and a courthouse gathering, and held liable for administrative offences, or disobeying police orders. The Code of Administrative Offences art 20(2) made it an offence to breach procedures for conduct of public gatherings. He was fined and got short custodial sentences. He argued this breached the European Convention on Human Rights articles 5, 6, 11 and 18. He argued the Russian authorities had an ulterior purpose of stopping his political engagement and influence.

Judgment

[edit]

The European Court of Human Rights held[full citation needed] there were breaches of articles 5, 6 and 11. The Russian courts acted unfairly by basing their judgments only on police accounts, and in all seven cases there was a breach of the right to assembly. Article 18 was breached because there was a pattern of arrest, on progressively more implausible grounds. Response was increasingly severe. It was aimed to suppress political pluralism, which formed part of 'effective political democracy' governed by 'the rule of law'.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Nussberger, Angelika (14 May 2020). "The European Court of Human Rights at Sixty – Challenges and Perspectives". The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review. 1 (1): 11–13. doi:10.1163/26663236-00101006. ISSN 2666-3228. S2CID 219771785.
  2. ^ Heri, Corina (25 April 2019). "Navalnyy v. Russia (Eur. Ct. H.R.)". International Legal Materials. 58 (2): 315–370. doi:10.1017/ilm.2019.15. ISSN 0020-7829. S2CID 186483279.
[edit]