Jump to content

Netherlands fallacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 81.140.194.174 (talk) at 23:10, 22 June 2015 (Ehrlich is controversial, so his claims should be attributed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Netherlands fallacy refers to an error Paul R. Ehrlich and his co-authors claim others make in assuming that the environmental impacts of the Netherlands and other rich nations are contained within their national borders.

Ecologists since the late 20th century have analyzed the ecological sink status and sink capacities of poor nations. As polluting industries migrate from rich to poor nations, the national ecological footprint of rich nations shrinks, whereas the international ecological footprint may increase or also decrease. The nature of the fallacy is to ignore increasing environmental damage in many developing nations and in international waters attributable to the imported goods or changes in the economy of such nations directly due to developed nations.

Such an approach may lead to incorrect assertions such as the environmental impact of a particular developed country is reducing, when a holistic, international approach suggests the opposite. This may in turn support over-optimistic predictions toward the improvement of global environmental conditions.[1]

References

Bibliography

  • Ehrlich, P. R.; Holdren, J. P. (1971). "Impact of Population Growth" (PDF). Science. 171 (3977): 1212–1217. doi:10.1126/science.171.3977.1212. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Ehrlich, P. R.; Ehrlich, A. H. (1990). The Population Explosion. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-671-68984-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)