Particular values of the Riemann zeta function: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

5 March 2024

15 November 2023

12 October 2023

29 September 2023

12 July 2023

15 April 2023

9 April 2023

8 April 2023

16 March 2023

  • curprev 15:5215:52, 16 March 20232603:8080:6b0f:7ec:88e5:bdcd:77e0:584f talk 23,634 bytes +56 The reference I added shows the sign is + not -. The reason I double checked is the way the two equations are written you could subtract the two and see there is a redundant formula in there for pi (isolate the second term in each identify for zeta(5) to have a factor of two and subtract the two equations from each other). Either way - reference shows the sign change. undo

6 March 2023

26 October 2022

21 October 2022

13 September 2022

7 September 2022

4 August 2022

30 July 2022

6 July 2022

29 November 2021

4 November 2021

27 October 2021

31 May 2021

30 May 2021

29 May 2021

10 May 2021

21 March 2021

20 March 2021

19 March 2021

18 March 2021

17 March 2021

9 March 2021

5 March 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)