Publius Clodius Pulcher

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Publius Clodius Pulcher (c. December 93 BC – 52 BC,[1] on January 18 of the pre-Julian calendar) was a Roman politician known for his popularist tactics. As tribune, he pushed through an ambitious legislative program, including a grain dole, but he is chiefly remembered for his feud with Marcus Tullius Cicero and Titus Annius Milo, whose supporters murdered him in the street.

A Roman nobilis of the patrician gens Claudia and a senator of an eccentric, mercurial and arrogant character,[2] Clodius became a major if disruptive force in Roman politics during the rise of the First Triumvirate of Pompey, Crassus and Julius Caesar (60–53 BC). He passed numerous laws in the tradition of the populares (the Leges Clodiae), and has been called "one of the most innovative urban politicians in Western history".[3]

Family and early career[edit]

Born as Publius Claudius Pulcher in 93 BC, the youngest son of Appius Claudius, he became known as Publius Clodius after his controversial adoption into the plebeian family of Fonteii in 59 BC.

He had two brothers and apparently five sisters (some historians think four).[citation needed] The identity of his mother's family continues to be one of the most disputed issues of 1st century BC Roman social history. Most likely she was a Servilia of the patrician Caepiones, daughter of Q. Servilius Caepio, or a Caecilia Metella, sister of Quintus Caecilius Metellus Celer.[4]

It is certain that he was close enough by maternal bloodline to be called frater of some notable figures of the time:

It appears that his father married twice and that among his numerous Claudian brothers and sisters, Clodius was a full sibling of only the two youngest girls, Claudia Metelli and Claudia Luculli. At various times, he was accused of incestuous relations with all his sisters, both of whom were known as Clodia in consequence of his transfer to plebeian status in 59 BC. Claudia Metelli is usually identified as Lesbia, to whom the poet Catullus dedicated many of his poems, but the evidence is not conclusive.

There is reason to believe that Clodius married twice; Cicero refers to a certain Natta as his brother-in-law but does not mention his gentile name; and in a passage of uncertain authenticity, Maurus Servius Honoratus calls him Pinarius Natta.[5][6] The surname is known from the Pinaria gens but otherwise not among the Fulvii, but many scholars have still inferred the existence of a Lucius Fulvius Natta. However, Drumann provides reasons to believe that Clodius was married once before Fulvia, and that his first wife was Pinaria; then, his brother-in-law would have been Lucius Pinarius Natta. In 62 BC, Cicero refers to Natta as a stepson of Lucius Licinius Murena.[7][8][9]

Between 68 and 67 BC, Clodius was a legatus. In 62 BC or later[10] he married Fulvia of Tusculum, the daughter of Sempronia and the formidable principal heiress of the plebeian high noble family of Semproni Tuditani, which had died out in the male line, with her father (70s BC). Fulvia bore him at least one son and one daughter who survived to adulthood, and following his death, she married Gaius Scribonius Curio, tribune of plebs in 50 BC, and then Marcus Antonius the Triumvir (47–40 BC), also producing children by both important politicians.

Their daughter, Claudia (c. 57 BC or c. 55 BC – after 36 BC)[11] was wed to the young Augustus Caesar for political reasons in 43 BC or 42 BC, when she was barely of age,[12] and soon divorced in 40 BC after the imperious Fulvia joined with the consul Lucius Antonius in stirring up the Perusine War in 41.[13]

His homonymous son, Publius Claudius Pulcher (born c. 62–59 BC – aft. 31 BC),[14] turned out badly: a lethargic nonentity who rose to the praetorship only after 31 BC under the Second Triumvirs and died amid scandals of luxurious excess and an obsessive attachment to a common prostitute.[15] An inscription of ownership on an expensive Egyptian alabaster vase once owned by the son has survived to attest the latter's short official career and includes an unusual triple filiation, which confirms the literary evidence to the effect that Clodius' own filiation was Ap. f. Ap. n. (son of Appius cos.79, grandson of Appius cos.143).[16]

He took part in the Third Mithridatic War under his father's brother-in-law, Lucullus. However, considering himself treated with insufficient respect, he stirred up a revolt. His brother-in-law, Quintus Marcius Rex, governor of Cilicia, gave him the command of his fleet, but he was captured by pirates. On his release, he repaired to Syria, where he nearly lost his life during a mutiny that he was accused of instigating.

A curious incident took place during his time in pirate hands, which was to have later consequences. The pirates sought a good ransom price from Ptolemy of Cyprus, a nominal ally of Rome but was then involved in negotiations for a potential marriage to a daughter of Mithradates VI of Pontus. Ptolemy sent a fairly trivial sum, which so amused the pirates that they released Clodius without taking any money. He had evidently been overestimating his worth, and the transaction filled him with hatred for the Cypriot ruler.

In Rome and Gaul[edit]

Returning to Rome in 66 BC, Clodius was in serious need of protection from his brother-in-law because of the treason that he had committed in Lucullus' army and his incestuous relations with Lucullus' wife, which Lucullus had discovered upon his return the same year, prompting him to divorce her. Turning 27 in the year of his return (and already having exceeded the normal age for a first marriage, which was 20–26 because of his extended service in the east), Clodius wed Fulvia, the daughter of Sempronia of the Tuditani that year or the next year.[citation needed] At about the same time, Lucullus' very close relative (probably nephew) Lucius Licinius Murena became Sempronia's third husband. He also collusively prosecuted Catiline in 65 on a charge of extortion from his African command and so helped secure his acquittal.[17]

In 64 BC, Clodius went to Gaul on Lucius Murena's command staff.[18] He returned to Rome with his commander in 63, in time for the elections at which Murena secured his family's first consulate, mainly with the help of Lucullus' army veterans and the consul Cicero. Clodius almost certainly assisted as well.

Catiline's defeat at the same elections was the signal to begin his attempt at a violent coup d'état to slaughter most of the nobility, especially the plebeian nobles and senators, and setting up a small patrician-dominated oligarchy. Although Clodius was still a patrician and it later suited Cicero to portray him as a participant in the Catilinarian conspiracy, Clodius was not involved. On the contrary, he maintained his protective closeness to Murena and the cause of the optimates, rendering Cicero every assistance. As the great drama of the detection and arrest of the conspirators unfolded, Clodius appears to have joined the many other equestrian and noble youths, who clustered about the consul as an informal but potent and intimidating bodyguard.[19]

In the same year, one of Clodius' sisters (presumably Lucullus' former wife since the other two were still married to Marcius Rex and Metellus Celer, respectively) attempted to persuade Cicero to divorce his wife, Terentia, and to marry her instead. That made Terentia furious with the Claudia in question and, by association, with the wider family.[19]

Bona Dea scandal and trial for incestum[edit]

The rites of Bona Dea ("The Good Goddess") were held in December, at the house of Rome's leading magistrate. In 62, they were held in Julius Caesar's grace and favour house in the Regia, lent to him as pontifex maximus. They were hosted by his wife, Pompeia and his mother, Aurelia, and they were supervised by the Vestal Virgins. It was a cult from which men were excluded and they were not permitted to speak or even know the goddess's name: the euphemism "Good Goddess" was used. Clodius intruded on the rites, disguised as a woman and apparently intent on finding and seducing Pompeia[citation needed] but was discovered. The ensuing scandal dragged on for months during which Pompey returned from the east, Caesar divorced his wife, and most public business was suspended. Lucullus was determined to use the opportunity to destroy Clodius' political career and eventually brought him to trial on the capital charge of incestum. Three Corneli Lentuli prosecuted.[20] Lucullus had numerous household slaves testify to Clodius' incest with his sister Clodia; Terentia, who had hosted the previous year's rites, almost certainly pressed Cicero to testify against Clodius in revenge for the latter's unsuccessful but damaging prosecution in 73 of her half-sister, the Vestal Fabia, on a charge of incestum with Catiline.[21] Caesar's mother Aurelia and sister testified to Clodius' offense.[i] Caesar did his best to help Clodius by claiming that he knew nothing. When asked why, if he knew nothing, Caesar had divorced his wife, Caesar made the famous response that Caesar's wife had to be beyond suspicion.[22] Clodius perjured himself with a fabricated alibi that he was not in Rome on the day of the rites, which Cicero was in a position to refute but was uncertain whether he should do so. Eventually, national and domestic politics forced his hand. He was most eager to forge a détente between Lucullus and Pompey, who were at loggerheads over the settlement of the eastern provinces and wished to do Lucullus a favour in this matter. At home, Terentia demanded to give his testimony and ensure the destruction of her subversive rival's brother and lover. Cicero did so, but Marcus Licinius Crassus decided the outcome of the trial by bribery of the jurors en masse to secure Clodius' acquittal.

When it was all over, Clodius' politics had been transformed and became more deeply personal than ever before. He clung to Crassus[citation needed] as his chief benefactor and was grateful to Caesar for his attempt to help him. He even appears to have borne no serious grudge against the leaders of his prosecution, owing to the wrongs he had done them. However, he had risked interfering with Lucullus' army in the east directly in the interests of Pompey, who had not lifted a finger to help him.despite being locked in serious political dispute with the Luculli brothers[citation needed]. Also, he had assisted Cicero against Catiline.

Sex and politics in the late Republic[edit]

If the Republic must be destroyed by someone, Cicero fulminates against Clodius in mock resignation,[23] let it at least be destroyed by a real man (Latin vir). Clodius' transvestitism in the Bona Dea incident was to supply Cicero with invective ammunition for years. Like other popularist politicians of his time, as embodied by Caesar and Marcus Antonius,[24] Clodius was accused of exerting a sexual magnetism that was attractive to both women and men and enhanced his political charisma: "The sexual power of Clodius, his suspected ability to win the wife of Caesar, might be read as indicating the potency of his political influence".[25]

Eleanor Winsor Leach claimed, in her Lacanian analysis "Gendering Clodius",[26] that the frequency and intensity of Cicero's word plays on the cognomen Pulcher ("handsome, lovely")[27] show a certain fascination that masqueraded under rebuke. Leach calls Cicero's description of Clodius' attire when he intruded on the rites amounts to a verbal striptease, as the privative Latin preposition a ("from") deprives the future tribune of his garments and props one by one:

Cicero's accusations of sexual profligacy against Clodius, including the attempt to seduce Caesar's wife into adultery[29] and his incestuous relations with his sisters[30] fail to enlarge in scope over time, as Clodius' marriage to the formidable Fulvia appears to have been an enduring model of fidelity until death cut it short.[31] At the same time, even devotion to one's wife could be construed by the upholders of traditional values as undermining one's manhood since it implied dependence on a woman.[32]

Adoption into Fonteii family[edit]

On his return from Sicily, where he had been quaestor between 61 BC and 60 BC, Clodius sought to hold a tribunate of plebs with the stated intention to get revenge on his bitter enemy, Cicero. However, to be elected as a tribune, he had to renounce his patrician rank since that magistracy was not permitted to patricians. In 59 BC, during Caesar's first consulship, Clodius was able to enact a transfer to plebeian status by getting himself adopted by a certain P. Fonteius, who was much younger than him.[33] The process violated almost every proper form of adoption in Rome, which was a serious business involving clan and family rituals and inheritance rights. On 16 November, Clodius took office as tribune of the plebs and began preparations for his destruction of Cicero and an extensive populist legislative program to bind as much of the community as possible to his policies as beneficiaries.

Nonetheless, the legality of Clodius' transfer and all his acts and laws with it, remained contentious for many years. Most seriously, to be permitted to adopt a fellow citizen from another clan and its rites into his own, a Roman citizen was required to be at least middle-aged (beyond adulescentia, i.e. 30 or older)[citation needed] Clodius himself had turned 34 in 59 BC, and Fonteius, his adoptor, was even younger, something both illegal and unprecedented. Furthermore, once an adoption was made, the adoptee took his place within the adopting family with full rights and duties as the adopter's eldest son, such as changing his name to that of the adopter, and an additional cognomen was normally appended to indicate the clan or the family of his birth.

Instead, Clodius violated that essential convention and simply gave a plebeian spelling to his clan name, from Claudius to Clodius turning the act of adoption to an open farce.[34] He emphasised thus that his sole interest in the enactment of this public socioreligious farce was to obtain a semblance of technical permission to hold the key plebeian magistracy, with its extensive legislative powers and protective sacrosanctity.

Tribunate[edit]

As tribune, Clodius introduced a law that threatened exile to anyone who executed a Roman citizen without a trial. Cicero, having executed members of the Catiline conspiracy four years before without a trial, had had a public dispute with Clodius and was clearly the intended target of the law. Cicero argued that the senatus consultum ultimum indemnified him from punishment and attempted to gain the support of the senators and consuls, especially of Pompey. When help was not forthcoming, Cicero went into exile and arrived at Thessalonica, Greece, on May 29, 58 BC.[35] The day that Cicero left Italy into exile, Clodius proposed another law which forbade Cicero approaching within 400 miles (640 km) of Italy and confiscated his property. The bill was passed, and Cicero's house on the Palatine was destroyed by Clodius' supporters, as were his villas in Tusculum and Formiae.[35][36] Cicero's property was confiscated by order of Clodius, his mall on the Palatine burned down and its site put up for auction. Clodius had a temple of Libertas (Liberty) built on the site of Cicero's house so even if Cicero returned, he would not be able to take the site back. Clodoius also tried to sell Cicero's other property, but there were no takers.[37]

Clodius became exhilarated with his power and importance and so wasted no time enacting a substantial legislative programme. The Leges Clodiae included setting up a regular dole of free grain, which had been distributed monthly at variously and heavily discounted prices but was now to be given away at no charge, increasing Clodius' political status. Clodius also abolished the right of taking the omens on a fixed day, if they were declared unfavourable, of preventing the assembly of the comitia, which had been possessed by every magistrate by the terms of the Lex Aelia et Fufia. He also prevented the censors from excluding any citizen from the Senate or inflicting any punishment upon him unless he had been publicly tried and convicted.

He had noticed that violence and physical force had become the main means of maintaining dominance in Roman politics. Therefore, he abolished the restrictions on establishing new collegia, the old social and political clubs or guilds of workmen and had them set up by his agents. The guilds were essentially organized and trained as gangs of thugs, and Clodius used them to control the streets of Rome by driving off the supporters of his political opponents.[38] The men were attacking any politician who dared confront their patron by means of various forms of harassment, including accosting and beating in the streets, loud booing, showering with filth at the games, besieging houses by throwing rocks or even weapons and even attempting to burn them. Thus the opposition to Clodius was muted, and he became the "king of the Roman streets".[38]

Out of personal hatred for the Lagid king Ptolemy of Cyprus, the younger brother of Pharaoh Ptolemy XII Auletes, he passed a bill terminating his kingship and annexing Cyprus to Rome. Complying to the wishes of the First Triumvirate,[39] he cleverly selected Cato the Younger to be sent to Cyprus with a special grant of praetorian command rights to take possession of the island and the royal treasures and to preside over the administrative incorporation of Cyprus into the Roman province of Cilicia. The measure was planned both to remove Cato, potentially a serious and difficult opponent, from Rome for some time (he would be away for more than two years) and to turn him into an advocate for the legitimacy of Clodius' adoption and tribunate, which happened, later causing a great deal of friction between Cato and Clodius' bitterest enemies, especially Cicero.

However, Clodius' good relationship to the triumvirate deteriorated when Pompeius criticised his policies and started contemplating to recall Cicero from exile. Then, an infuriated Clodius turned against Pompeius, starting to harass him, reputedly with the secret approval of Crassus. When Pompeius discussed, with one of the tribunes, the possibility of recalling Cicero, Clodius culminated his harassment by organising an attempt to assassinate him in August 58 BC. Then, his gangs set up a blockade of his house, forcing Pompeius to stay at home until the end of the year to avoid the attacks.[40] Clodius, frustrated, turned against Caesar by declaring illegal his consular legislation during the year 59. However, the act set the final motion for the recall of Cicero: when Clodius vetoed a relate bill, it was supported by eight tribunes, Caesar finally gave his agreement for a renewed attempt on passing the bill right after Clodius' term, in December 58. In January 57, one of the new tribunes tried to pass the bill, but his attempt was met by the usual violence and failed, making clear that the domination of the streets and public spaces of Romes by the gangs of Clodius had to be faced with similar violent methods. Pompeius approved for the tribunes Milo and Publius Sestius to raise their own gangs in order to oppose Clodius' thugs, with some gladiator trainers and ex-gladiators as leaders and trainers. Street fighting continued through the first half of 57, but Clodius lost the battle and the bill about Cicero passed.[41]

Clodius subsequently attacked the workmen who were rebuilding Cicero's house at public cost, assaulted Cicero himself in the street and set fire to the house of Cicero's younger brother, Quintus Tullius Cicero.

In 56 BC, while curule aedile, he impeached Milo for public violence (de vi) while he was defending his house against the attacks of Clodius' gang, and he also charged him with keeping armed bands in his service. Judicial proceedings were hindered by violent outbreaks, and the matter was finally dropped.

Death[edit]

In the elections of 53 BC, when Milo was a candidate for the consulship and Clodius for the praetorship, violent clashes erupted in the streets of Rome between the gangs of Clodius and Milo, twice delaying the election.[42]

On January 18, 52 BC, Clodius was returning to Rome by way of the Appian Way from a visit to some of his holdings in the hinterlands. Clodius was travelling lightly with a band of 30 armed slaves and, uncommonly for him, without his wife. By chance, Milo was travelling the other way with his wife as well as an escort which included gladiators, and the two groups passed each other. The encounter between the two groups passed without incident until the last pair at the back of each train began a scuffle. It was then believed that Clodius turned back and was wounded by a javelin thrown by one of the gladiators in Milo's party. He was brought to a nearby inn for his wounds, and his slaves were killed or driven off.[43]

Milo made the decision that a live political enemy was more dangerous than a dead one and ordered for his gladiators to kill the injured Clodius. The body was later discovered by a passing Roman citizen and sent back to Rome. There, Clodius' wife and two tribunes rallied his supporters to use the Curia as Clodius' funeral pyre, which resulted in the destruction of the Curia Hostilia. That action and the need to restore order in Rome are cited as the key reasons for the Senate's appointment of Pompey as sole consul.[44]

The later trial of Milo would become famous for Cicero's defense of the accused Milo with his famous speech, Pro Milone, which would ultimately fail to save Milo from exile since Cicero never delivered the speech, as he had been scared off from the Forum by the armed guard introduced by Pompey.[45] Additionally, in the presence of the soldiers, the jurors were affected to decide according to Pompey's wishes.[46]

In popular culture[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ It is uncertain which of Caesar's sisters gave testimony against Clodius: Julia Major or Julia Minor.

References[edit]

  1. ^ The standard and most thorough biography is W. Jeffrey Tatum's The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher (University of North Carolina Press, 1999); see p. 33 online for date of birth and pp. 239–240 on the date and circumstances of Clodius' death.
  2. ^ Billows, Richard A. (2009), pp. 102, 167.
  3. ^ Stephen L. Dyson, Rome: A Living Portrait of an Ancient City (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010), p. 7 online.
  4. ^ T.P. Wiseman, Cinna the Poet and other Roman Essays, (Leicester University Press, 1974), ch. 12 "The Last of the Metelli", pp.176-191, with stemma at 182-3
  5. ^ Cicero, Pro Domo Sua 45, 52; Epistulae ad Atticum iv. 8, b. § 3.
  6. ^ Servius, ad Virg. Aen. viii. 269.
  7. ^ Marcus Tullius Cicero, Pro Murena 35; Pro Domo Sua 52.
  8. ^ Wilhelm Drumann, Geschichte Roms ii. p. 370.
  9. ^ Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, William Smith, Editor, "Natta," No. 2.
  10. ^ Tatum places the wedding of Clodius and Fulvia within a time frame of 62–59 BC but probably during Murena's consulship of 62; see The Patrician Tribune pp. 60–61 online.
  11. ^ Tatum, Patrician Tribune p. 60 online.
  12. ^ Roman women of the aristocracy were usually married at the age of 15 or 16, but particularly high-ranking and so desirable brides might become engaged as early as 12; see Ronald Syme, "Marriage Ages for Roman Senators," Historia 26 (1987) 318–332.
  13. ^ Suetonius Divus Augustus 62.1: "As a youth he had had a daughter of P. Servilius Isauricus for his betrothed, but reconciling with Antonius after their initial discord, when the troops of both men were insisting that they should additionally be joined by some form of close relationship, he took as his wife Antonius' step-daughter Claudia, Fulvia's child by Publius Clodius, although she was barely yet of marrying age; and after his clash arose with Fulvia the mother-in-law, he divorced her still intact and virgin."
  14. ^ Tatum (Patrician Tribune p. 61) points out that in 44 BC, Claudius could still be called a puer, "boy", but granting that age, categories such as puer, adolescens and iuvenis are fluid.
  15. ^ Valerius Maximus III.5.3
  16. ^ T. P. Wiseman, "Pulcher Claudius", HSCP 74 (1970), 208-221, at 210, with family stemma at 220. The inscription is CIL VI 1282 = ILS 882: P.CLAVDIVS P.F.AP.N.AP.PRON.PVLCHER Q. QVAESITOR PR. AVGVR
  17. ^ Cicero de haruspicum responso 42: "Later after inciting Lucullus' army by unspeakable crime he fled from those parts and soon after his arrival in Rome made arrangements with his relatives not to prosecute them while he accepted cash from Catilina to prosecute him collusively in the most disgraceful manner."
  18. ^ Cicero de haruspicum responso 42: "Next he took himself into Gallia with Murena, in which province he wrote all over the testaments of dead men, murdered orphans and arranged nefarious criminal contracts and partnerships with many."
  19. ^ a b Plutarch Cicero 29.
  20. ^ Valerius Maximus IV 3.5. The senior prosecutor is thought to have been Lucius Cornelius Lentulus Crus; Gaius Curio pater, consul in 76, was the vigorous chief advocate.
  21. ^ David F. Epstein, "Cicero's Testimony at the Bona dea Trial", Classical Philology, Vol. 81, No. 3, Jul., 1986, pp. 239 - 235.
  22. ^ Plutarch, Caesar, 10.
  23. ^ De Haruspicium Responso 20.42, as paraphrased and discussed by Eleanor Winsor Leach, "Gendering Clodius," Classical World 94 (2001), pp. 338–339. The original quote expresses vehemence by disjointed and repetitive syntax: quid est, quid valet, quid adfert, ut tanta civitas, si cadet — quod di omen obruant! — a viro tamen confecta videatur? ("What's the point, what's it worth, what's the relevance, if such a polity collapses — and may the gods overturn that doom! — unless it at least appears to have been brought about by a [real] man?").
  24. ^ Catharine Edwards, The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome (Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 63–64 online et passim.
  25. ^ Edwards, Politics of Immorality, p. 47 online.
  26. ^ Eleanor Winsor Leach, "Gendering Clodius," Classical World 94 (2001) 335–359.
  27. ^ Tatum, Patrician Tribune, p. 43 online.
  28. ^ P. Clodius, a crocota, a mitra, a muliebribus soleis purpureisque fasceolis, a strophio, a psalterio, <a> flagitio, a stupro est factus repente popularis: Cicero, the speech De Haruspicium Responso 21.44, delivered May 56 BC. Translation and discussion by Leach, "Gendering Clodius," p. 338.
  29. ^ Whether Clodius was already married to Fulvia in December 62 BC, at the time of the Bona Dea incident, is unclear; Tatum's chronological frame of 62–59 BC (Patrician Tribune pp. 60–61 online) allows for the possibility that Clodius was a newlywed at the time.
  30. ^ Tatum, Patrician Tribune pp. 41–42.
  31. ^ "Clodius was very capable in the fifties of adopting a posture of strict religiosity and old-fashioned rectitude"; even Cicero notes that Clodius rarely traveled without his wife (Pro Milone 28), and "the prevailing assumption … was that Clodius had become quite the family man" (Tatum, Patrician Tribune, p. 42).
  32. ^ Tatum, Patrician Tribune p. 315; Edwards, Politics of Immorality p. 85 online, noting that Pompey's contentment in the early 50s was attributed to his happy marriage to Caesar's daughter.
  33. ^ Billows, Richard A. (2009), p.118.
  34. ^ Billows, Richard A. (2009), pp. 102, 108.
  35. ^ a b Haskell, H.J.: This was Cicero, 1924 200-1.
  36. ^ Plutarch. Cicero 32.
  37. ^ Bingley: Cicero, 3-4.
  38. ^ a b Billows, Richard A. (2009), p. 167-168.
  39. ^ Billows, Richard A. (2009), p. 168.
  40. ^ Billows, Richard (2009), p. 168-169.
  41. ^ Billows, Richard (2009), p. 169-170.
  42. ^ Tatum, W. Jeffrey (1999). The Patrician Tribune, Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill: UNC Press Books. p. 235. 
  43. ^ Tatum, W. Jeffrey (1999). Publius Clodius Pulcher, The Patrician Tribune. Chapel Hill: UNC Press Books. pp. 239–240. 
  44. ^ Gruen, Erich S. (1974). The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. pp. 233–234. 
  45. ^ Settle, James N. (1963). "The Trial of Milo and the Other Pro Milone". Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association (The Johns Hopkins University Press) 94: 268–280. Retrieved 24 January 2014. 
  46. ^ Billows, Richard A. (2009), p.184.

Ancient sources[edit]

  • Cicero numerous Letters (ad Atticum, ad Familiares, ad Quintum fratrem); de domo sua ad pontifices, de haruspicum responso, pro M. Caelio, pro P. Sestio, de provincis consularibus, In L. Pisonem, pro T. Milone.
  • Stangl, Thomas: Ciceronis Orationum Scholiastae: Asconius. Scholia Bobiensia. Scholia Pseudoasconii Sangallensia. Scholia Cluniacensia et recentiora Ambrosiana ac Vaticana. Scholia Lugdunensia sive Gronoviana et eorum excerpta Lugdunensia (Vienna, 1912; reprinted Georg Olms, Hildesheim, 1964)
  • Asconius. Caesar Giarratano (ed.) Q. Asconii Pediani Commentarii, (Rome, 1920; reprinted Adolf M. Hakkert, Amsterdam, 1967)
  • Plutarch Roman Lives of: Lucullus, Pompeius, Cicero, Caesar, Cato
  • L. Cassius Dio Roman History, books XXXVI-XL

Modern works[edit]

  • Gentile, I: Clodio e Cicerone (Milan, 1876)
  • Beesley, E S: "Cicero and Clodius," in Fortnightly Review, v.; G Lacour-Gayet, De P. Clodio Pulchro (Paris, 1888), and in Revue historique (Sept. 1889);
  • Billows, Richard A.: Julius Caesar: The Colossus of Rome (Routledge, 2009), ISBN 0-203-41276-1
  • G Boissier, Cicero and his Friends (Eng. trans., 1897)
  • White, H: Cicero, Clodius and Milo (New York, 1900)
  • Lintott, Andrew W.: "P. Clodius Pulcher – Felix Catilina?", Greece & Rome, n.s.14 (1967), 157-69
  • —: Violence in Republican Rome (Oxford University Press, 1968)
  • Moreau, Philippe: Clodiana religio. Un procès politique en 61 av. J.-C. (Les Belles Lettres, Paris, 1982) ISBN 2-251-33103-4
  • Tatum, W. Jeffrey. The Patrician Tribune: P. Clodius Pulcher. Studies in the History of Greece and Rome (University of North Carolina Press, 1999) hardcover ISBN 0-8078-2480-1
  • Stanisław Stabryła, "P. Clodius Pulcher: a Politician or a Terrorist," in Jerzy Styka (ed), Violence and Aggression in the Ancient World (Kraków, Ksiegarnia Akademicka, 2006) (Classica Cracoviensia, 10),
  • Wilfried Nippel: Publius Clodius Pulcher – "der Achill der Straße". In: Karl-Joachim Hölkeskamp, Elke Stein-Hölkeskamp (Hrsg.): Von Romulus zu Augustus. Große Gestalten der römischen Republik. Beck, München 2000. S. 279–291. ISBN 3-406-46697-4
  • Fezzi, L: Il tribuno Clodio (Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2008) ISBN 88-420-8715-7
  • A recent scholarly work, the 1999 biography by W. Jeffrey Tatum, has tried to counteract a largely hostile tradition based on the invective of his opponent Cicero and to present a more balanced picture of Clodius' politics.
  • Public Domain This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "article name needed". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.