Jump to content

Carrington Event

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kintetsubuffalo (talk | contribs) at 14:50, 18 December 2014 (Carrington Super Flare). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sunspots of September 1, 1859, as sketched by Richard Carrington. A and B mark the initial positions of an intensely bright event, which moved over the course of 5 minutes to C and D before disappearing.

The solar storm of 1859, also known as the Carrington Event,[1] was a powerful geomagnetic solar storm in 1859 during solar cycle 10. A solar coronal mass ejection hit Earth's magnetosphere and induced one of the largest geomagnetic storms on record. The associated "white light flare" in the solar photosphere was observed and recorded by English astronomers Richard C. Carrington and Richard Hodgson.

Studies have shown that a solar storm of this magnitude occurring today would likely cause widespread problems for modern civilization. There is an estimated 12% chance of a similar event occurring between 2012 and 2022.[2]

Carrington super flare

From August 28 through September 2, 1859, numerous sunspots were observed on the Sun. On August 29, southern aurorae were observed as far north as Queensland in Australia.[3] Just before noon on September 1, the English amateur astronomers Richard Carrington and Richard Hodgson independently made the first observations of a solar flare.[4] The flare was associated with a major coronal mass ejection (CME) that travelled directly toward Earth, taking 17.6 hours to make the 93 million mile journey. It is believed that the relatively high speed of this CME (typical CMEs take several days to arrive at Earth) was made possible by a prior CME, perhaps the cause of the large aurora event on August 29, that "cleared the way" of ambient solar wind plasma for the Carrington event.[4]

Because of a simultaneous "crochet" observed in the Kew Observatory magnetometer record by Scottish physicist Balfour Stewart and a geomagnetic storm observed the following day, Carrington suspected a solar-terrestrial connection. Worldwide reports on the effects of the geomagnetic storm of 1859 were compiled and published by Elias Loomis, which support the observations of Carrington and Stewart.

On September 1–2, 1859, one of the largest recorded geomagnetic storms (as recorded by ground-based magnetometers) occurred. Aurorae were seen around the world, those in the northern hemisphere even as far south as the Caribbean; those over the Rocky Mountains were so bright that their glow awoke gold miners, who began preparing breakfast because they thought it was morning.[4] People who happened to be awake in the northeastern US could read a newspaper by the aurora's light.[5] The aurora was visible as far from the poles as Cuba and Hawaii.[6]

Telegraph systems all over Europe and North America failed, in some cases giving telegraph operators electric shocks.[7] Telegraph pylons threw sparks.[8] Some telegraph systems continued to send and receive messages despite having been disconnected from their power supplies.[9]

On Saturday, September 3, 1859, the Baltimore American and Commercial Advertiser reported, "Those who happened to be out late on Thursday night had an opportunity of witnessing another magnificent display of the auroral lights. The phenomenon was very similar to the display on Sunday night, though at times the light was, if possible, more brilliant, and the prismatic hues more varied and gorgeous. The light appeared to cover the whole firmament, apparently like a luminous cloud, through which the stars of the larger magnitude indistinctly shone. The light was greater than that of the moon at its full, but had an indescribable softness and delicacy that seemed to envelop everything upon which it rested. Between 12 and 1 o'clock, when the display was at its full brilliancy, the quiet streets of the city resting under this strange light, presented a beautiful as well as singular appearance."[10]

In June 2013, a joint venture from researchers at Lloyd's of London and Atmospheric and Environmental Research (AER) in the United States used data from the Carrington Event to estimate the current cost of a similar event to the US alone at $0.6–2.6 trillion.[11]

Similar events

Ice cores containing thin nitrate-rich layers have been analyzed to reconstruct a history of past solar storms predating reliable observations. Data from Greenland ice cores, gathered by Kenneth G. McCracken[12] and others, show evidence that events of this magnitude—as measured by high-energy proton radiation, not geomagnetic effect—occur approximately once per 500 years, with events at least one-fifth as large occurring several times per century.[13] However, more recent work by the ice core community (McCracken et al. are space scientists) shows that nitrate spikes are not a result of solar energetic particle events, so use of this technique is in doubt. 10Be and 14C are considered to be more reliable indicators by the ice core community.[14] These similar but much more extreme cosmic ray events, however, may originate outside the solar system and even outside the galaxy. Less severe storms have occurred in 1921 and 1960, when widespread radio disruption was reported. The March 1989 geomagnetic storm knocked out power across large sections of Quebec. On July 23, 2012 a "Carrington-class" Solar Superstorm (Solar flare, Coronal mass ejection, Solar EMP) was observed; its trajectory missed Earth in orbit. Information about these observations was shared first publicly by NASA on April 28, 2014.[2][15]

See also

2

References

  1. ^ Philips, Tony (January 21, 2009). "Severe Space Weather--Social and Economic Impacts". NASA Science: Science News. science.nasa.gov. Retrieved February 16, 2011.
  2. ^ a b Phillips, Dr. Tony (July 23, 2014). "Near Miss: The Solar Superstorm of July 2012". NASA. Retrieved July 26, 2014.
  3. ^ "SOUTHERN AURORA". The Moreton Bay Courier (Brisbane, Qld. : 1846 - 1861). Brisbane, Qld.: National Library of Australia. September 7, 1859. p. 2. Retrieved May 17, 2013.
  4. ^ a b c Odenwald, Sten F.; Green, James L. (July 28, 2008). "Bracing the Satellite Infrastructure for a Solar Superstorm". Scientific American. Retrieved February 16, 2011.
  5. ^ Richard A. Lovett (March 2, 2011). "What If the Biggest Solar Storm on Record Happened Today?". National Geographic News. Retrieved September 5, 2011.
  6. ^ "Monster radiation burst from Sun". BBC News. May 14, 2013. Retrieved May 15, 2013.
  7. ^ Committee on the Societal and Economic Impacts of Severe Space Weather Events: A Workshop, National Research Council (2008). Severe Space Weather Events--Understanding Societal and Economic Impacts: A Workshop Report. National Academies Press. p. 13. ISBN 0-309-12769-6.
  8. ^ Odenwald, Sten F. (2002). The 23rd Cycle. Columbia University Press. p. 28. ISBN 0-231-12079-6.
  9. ^ Carlowicz, Michael J.; Lopez, Ramon E. (2002). Storms from the Sun: The Emerging Science of Space Weather. National Academies Press. p. 58. ISBN 0-309-07642-0.
  10. ^ "The Aurora Borealis". Baltimore American and Commercial Advertiser. Baltimore, Maryland. September 3, 1859. p. 2; Column 2. Retrieved February 16, 2011.
  11. ^ Solar Storm Risk to the North American Electric Grid Lloyd's 2013
  12. ^ "How do you determine the effects of a solar flare that took place 150 years ago?" (PDF). Stuart Clarks Universe. Retrieved May 23, 2012.
  13. ^ McCracken, K. G.; Dreschhoff, G. A. M.; Zeller, E. J.; Smart, D. F.; Shea, M. A. (2001). "Solar cosmic ray events for the period 1561–1994 1. Identification in polar ice, 1561–1950". Journal of Geophysical Research. 106 (A10): 21, 585–21, 598. Bibcode:2001JGR...10621585M. doi:10.1029/2000JA000237. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help) Closed access icon
  14. ^ Wolff, E. W.; Bigler, M.; Curran, M. A. J.; Dibb, J.; Frey, M. M.; Legrand, M. (2012). "The Carrington event not observed in most ice core nitrate records". Geophysical Research Letters. 39 (8): 21, 585–21, 598. Bibcode:2012GeoRL..39.8503W. doi:10.1029/2012GL051603. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)Closed access icon
  15. ^ Staff (April 28, 2014). "Video (04:03) - Carrington-class coronal mass ejection narrowly misses Earth". NASA. Retrieved July 26, 2014.

Further reading

  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s11207-005-4980-z, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s11207-005-4980-z instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1029/2002JA009504, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1029/2002JA009504 instead.
  • Issue 2 of Volume 38, Pages 115-388 (2006), of Advances in Space Research, an issue entitled "The Great Historical Geomagnetic Storm of 1859: A Modern Look"
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2006.09.001, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2006.09.001 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.077, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.077 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.054, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.054 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.157, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.157 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.12.021, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.12.021 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.053, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.053 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2006.01.013, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2006.01.013 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.102, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.102 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.076, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.076 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.055, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.08.055 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.158, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.158 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.156, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.156 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.116, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.116 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.01.111, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.01.111 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.100, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.100 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.085, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.085 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.09.044, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.09.044 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2006.06.010, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2006.06.010 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.06.070, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.06.070 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.10.046, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2005.10.046 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2006.07.006, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2006.07.006 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2006.07.004, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2006.07.004 instead.
  • Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.asr.2006.07.005, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1016/j.asr.2006.07.005 instead.