Talk:Folie à Deux (The X-Files)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleFolie à Deux (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starFolie à Deux (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 5) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 20, 2012Good article nomineeListed
October 26, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Folie à Deux (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 02:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one for review. Let's read some X-Files. TBrandley 02:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lede: Link science fiction
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lede: The episode originally aired in the United States on May 10, 1998 on the Fox network → The episode originally aired on the Fox network on May 10, 1998
    I rearranged this, but left the part about the United States. You've suggested I add that before, and I don't want to have to go through the other articles, since removing it wouldn't match.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lede: Quotes shouldn't be inside the monster-of-week link, but outside of it
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lede: in its initial broadcast → upon its initial broadcast
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lede: It received largely positive reviews from critics, with many commenting upon its creepiness. → It received largely positive reviews, with many critics commenting upon the installment's creepiness.
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Plot: "Dana Scully" is?
    Done. Add that she's his partner.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Plot: As per MOS:ACRO, please write out SWAT fully on the first mention, then write (SWAT)
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Production: Unlink Folie à deux; it's already linked above in "Plot"
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Production: "In fact," is not needed.
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Production: "North Vancouver, British Columbia" should be two separate links
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reception: → Broadcast and reception. To match with other ep. articles
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reception: premiered → originally aired
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reception: "Folie à Deux" premiered on the Fox network on May 10, 1998. The episode later debuted in the United Kingdom on BBC One on March 10, 1999 → "Folie à Deux" premiered on the Fox network on May 10, 1998, and was first broadcast in the United Kingdom on BBC One on March 10, 1999
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reception: "Todd VanDerWerff" of who? Surely his writing for someone, The A.V. Club?
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • References: Ref. 13: pp should just be p, like the others
    Since it covers more than one page, the correct format is to write "pp".--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • External links: on → at
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • External links: Categories should be sorted in alphebitcal order below please.
    Done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overall; like all others, a great article. In good shape, once the issues are fixed, I will be happy to pass. Cheers, TBrandley 16:59, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've addressed all the issues. Thank you for reviewing.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 19:23, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Looks good. I'll pass the article. TBrandley 02:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Gun[edit]

Is the gun Lambert uses really an AK-47. I know nothing about guns. Sheherazahde (talk) 10:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to Guns in Movies website it was a Norinco Type 84S-1 semi-automatic rifle with underfolder stock - 5.56x45mm Shadowcaster (talk) 15:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]