Talk:10 Bold Drama

	Australia portal 10 Bold Drama is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Not in Tasmania?

There was a lot of controversy about the large amount of Freeview adds shown in Tas and the misleading notion that this channel would also be available in Tas. I think this is worth of comment in the article, but i can't be bothered wording it appropriately--TinTin (talk) 08:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Cross One HD will not be launched in Tasmania, due to a delay. See here: [1]. Eddie Blake 22:33, 1 July 2009 (AEST)

Requested move 2009

ONE (TV channel)→ One (TV channel) — Manual of Style (trademarks); "ONE" is not the acronym O.N.E. - As One is not an acronym, WP:MOSCAPS states the article should be called One, rather than ONE. --Falcadore (talk) 09:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done

WOW...

When did WOW (Win WA) get access to One HD? ZanderSchubert (talk) 10:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move? 2011

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One (TV channel) → One HD — Channel is only in HD and is branded as One HD User:The Strikester 21:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support And One (TV channel) really needs to redirect to the disambiguation page, since it is highly ambiguous. 64.229.103.232 (talk) 06:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No-brainer, really. St Anselm (talk) 22:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

HD needs to be removed.

The channel is no longer called One HD. It is now simply called ONE. Title needs to be edited to reflect this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Audionut11 (talk • contribs) 09:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure One has a more important article definition than that of a TV station, so if you don't like One HD it will need a disamibuator like One (Australian television channel). ONE is not available as we only capitalise for Acronyms. If you like we can start a Move Request?

And please sing posts on talkpages with four of these ~ --Falcadore (talk) 10:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:10 Bold Drama/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article reads like a promotional brochure, it is almost a copy of the official website. Do we really need the list of "personalities" and there jobs? Also the sport list needs to be tidied up it has become quite busy with all the ad-hoc additions made over the last few months. I also doubt the list of sponsors is notable. Dr Worm (talk) 11:28, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 01:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

10 Bold 2018.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]