Talk:180th Division (1st Formation) (People's Republic of China)

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Non-objective article?

I am not a historian, but this article seems to be very subjective. First of all, I have problems with the following:

"During what the Chinese call the 5th campaign (May, 1950), ..."

Uh, if I remember correctly, the Korean War started on 25 June 1950, so we're a little early here. Any experts out there?

Aidan Bothwell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.162.203.148 (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right, the 5th campaign from 22 April 1951 - 10 June 1951.

Frank

totally disgraceful infomation

cite note 3 belongs to a paragraph which is completely talking rubbish, Pei shan, supposedly commander, was actually a fictional charater invented in ha jin's book called war trash, i accuse the ignorant writer there of extreme arrogance Btzkillerv (talk) 20:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

self-contradictionary

the article states that high-ranking officers, including the division commander, managed to escape, and at the end claim that the prisoners, AGAIN INCLUDING THE DIVISION COMMANDER were sent to some island. Only one of these statements can be correct, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thestor (talk • contribs) 18:52, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.aiipowmia.com/inter1/in102900china.html
- In 180th Division (People's Republic of China) on 2011-05-25 02:01:52, 404 Not Found
- In 180th Division (People's Republic of China) on 2011-06-01 22:30:36, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 180th Division (1st Formation)(People's Republic of China). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023171423/http://www.aiipowmia.com/inter1/in102900china.html to http://www.aiipowmia.com/inter1/in102900china.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]