Talk:1932 New South Wales constitutional crisis

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1932 New South Wales constitutional crisis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

This article is rather rambling and POV. Clearly written by a republican who has been influenced by the modern republican spin on the 1975 dismissal.

The article should be split into sections, and made less POV.

Another point, the dismissal itself was not based on the governor prejudging a court decision. It was because the premier had acted not only illegally, but in a manner that was revolutionary. The Canadian example does not compare. Imagine if a premier today was to direct all government agencies to withdraw all of their funds in cash, and deposit it all with allies of the premier in the Trades Union Hall, or the Chamber of Commerce - contrary to probably hundreds of law, rules, and regulations. This was no technical breach, and would seem to be what it was - revolutionaryJohnC (talk) 20:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]