Talk:1952 Bible Conference (Adventist)

Seventh-day Adventist Church Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source of Article[edit]

It appears that this was all lifted from the Internet at http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/1952-Bible-Conference

It appears that this is actually the other way around since I wrote this article in preparation for my Ph.D. comprehensive exams two years ago. It has been adapted for use on Wikipedia and I need to go back and supply the sources.

Michael Campbell Thewalkingstick 14 April 2007

Article titles[edit]

I have initiated discussion on the title of this article and two others at Talk:1888 Minneapolis General Conference#Article titles. Please reply there, Colin MacLaurin (talk) 10:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have put a comment there but probably should here, as well. I have just changed the name to have (Adventist) included in the title. This conference is very important to the Adventist church. The topics covered at the conference are relevant to others who study them. Hopefully that can be shown as we develop the report of the conference. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 16:32, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1952 Bible Conference (Adventist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ellenwhite.info/books/ellen-g-white-book-patriarchs-and-prophets-pp-32.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728044652/http://spectrummagazine.org/files/archive/archive16-20/16-3cottrell.pdf to http://spectrummagazine.org/files/archive/archive16-20/16-3cottrell.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.adventistarchives.org/documents.asp?CatID=94&SortBy=0&ShowDateOrder=False

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]