Talk:2-8-8-4

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Image copyright problem with Image:OP-15947.jpg

The image Image:OP-15947.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done Iain Bell (talk) 15:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Height of B&O engine

The infobox currently shows the engine being 16 in high. Obviously that's not right. Indefatigable (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:P38 Rus.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:P38 Rus.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:P38 Rus.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Simple articulated locomotives are not "Mallets".

Describing these locomotives as "Mallets" is incorrect. Mallet locomotives were compound locomotives, whereas all 2-8-8-4s were simple articulated locomotives, with high pressure steam fed to all 4 cylinders. --Yankingeorgia (talk) 05:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This comment is mistaken. Anatole Mallet's patent covered two items - a system of compounding using 4 cylinders in two engines, and a system of articulation where one engine was fixed to the boiler and the other free to rotate. It's entirely correct to refer to an engine using the Mallet system of articulation as a "Mallet articulated" even if it's not compound. By the same token, it's incorrect (altho common usage) to call such an engine a "simple articulated", because there are many non-Mallet engines which are both simple and articulated (almost all Garrets, for example). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6030:44:1B6:90A5:EC7A:E5A6 (talk) 22:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

got rid of the mallet

ok so i fixed the problem and instead of saying that a 2-8-8-4 was a mallet i changed it to simple expansion. 73.250.53.193 (talk) 15:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]