Talk:2005–06 South Pacific cyclone season

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as High-importance).

Other basin talkpages

2005: Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere

2005-06: S. Hemisphere - SW. Indian - Australian - S. Pacific

2006: Atlantic - W. Pacific - Central and East. Pacific - N. Indian - S. Hemisphere

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Tropical cyclone scales#Comparisons across basins|scales]] The anchor (#Comparisons across basins) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Todo

Sources and impact. Hurricanehink (talk) 13:48, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Disturbances

There were seventeen numbered but the season summary says there were only 15. So two were later downgraded in their analysis? Good kitty 18:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

im not sure but The seasonal Summuary on Nadis website for 05-06 says there were 15 but also says that Wati was 16F and so does Padgett Jason Rees (talk) 03:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wati: 1 or 2?

It says here that Wati had sustained winds of 155 km/hr using the average of winds over 10 minutes. It also says that Wati was a category 1 on the SSHS. But doesn't that mean that using 1 minute average sustained winds would place it at 175 km/hr? That would mean it's a category 2, as the SSHS relies on 1 minute average winds and not 10. Most articles go by that policy. Shouldn't it be changed? --UltimateDarkloid (talk) 19:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep the article is correct Wati was a cat 1 on the SSHS.Jason Rees (talk) 01:18, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would take up a lot of room to show both, so only the winds from the RSMC are displayed. The 1 min wind average is not adjusted from that - the number comes from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center. It is a Category 1 on SSHS and a Category 3 using Australia's scale. Both are virtually the same. Potapych (talk) 02:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So Nadi and the JTWC don't only use different measurements, but they don't even have equal values. OK. Thanks for clearing things up. --UltimateDarkloid (talk) 12:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The JTWC never have the same wind speed as the RSMC except sometimes when they do the EPac as they just C&P the NHC advisories Jason Rees (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this always causes confusion. --UltimateDarkloid (talk) 17:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Tropical Depression 01F

2005-11-30, 2005-12-01, 2005-12-02

Tropical Depression 02F

2005-12-03, 2005-12-04, 2005-12-05, 2005-12-06

Tropical Depression 03F

2005-12-09, 2005-12-10, 2005-12-13, 2005-12-14, 2005-12-15, 2005-12-16

Cyclone Tam /Tropical Depression 05F/Cyclone Urmil

2006-01-09, 2006-01-10, 2006-01-11, 2006-01-12, 2006-01-13

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2005–06 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.met.gov.fj/2010_2011%20TC%20Guide.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wamis.org/countries/fiji/fiji200510.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-science/pacific-rim/publications/all/icu/2005-10/article
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64F7esNTE?url=http://www.met.gov.fj/documents/TC_Seasonal_Summary_05-061190690520.pdf to http://www.met.gov.fj/documents/TC_Seasonal_Summary_05-061190690520.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080807181434/http://www.afap.org/apcedi/2006/01/apcedi-alert-spsm-cyclone-urmil-06f-2.html to http://www.afap.org/apcedi/2006/01/apcedi-alert-spsm-cyclone-urmil-06f-2.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2006/summ0602.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2006/summ0603.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2006/summ0604.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Temporary cyclone south.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:08, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]