Talk:2007 Massachusetts's 5th congressional district special election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Claudiahan5.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Error?

Wikipedia's entry on a Kevin Thompson (pastor) wouldn't seem to be the guy running and yet, that would be what this special election article would imply. 24.16.121.195 00:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't belive Kevin Thompson has his own page I think who ever put his name in just added the [[ because all the other names are linked as well. Gang14 17:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then shouldn't someone kill the link? 24.16.121.195 04:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to list things

I want opinions because apparentl y what i did was not liked and i dont like what was done after mine so please discuss Gang14 04:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gang14--who are you and why are you changing a candidate's correct information? The change of Patrick Murphy from bricklayer to Mason is clearly intentional. Patrick is not a Free Mason; he is a bricklayer and stone mason and the distinction is important. The edits you made earlier clearly show an attempt to obscure his candidacy in a shroud of Green Party candidates and Working Family candidates who do not exist and are not running. I have not made any attempts to change the description and biographical information connected to any other candidate. If you support transparency and respect the democracy of such a forum, you will not be a filter through which only partial truths can be told and molded. You also omitted Patrick's place of residence, Lowell and the high school of his graduation, Phillips Academy, at which he received a four-year scholarship. All of these omissions seem to support the idea that you have some sort of fear of his candidacy. I will grant you, that if you are indeed supporting another candidate, your insecurities are indeed grounded--this will become clear as the campaign progresses. For transparency, I submit to you that I support Murphy's candidacy for this election, but I also believe in ensuring that each candidate and their posts are treated respectfully and without bias. Beyond this post, I will not engage with you any further to thwart your attempts to pervert the truth and the layout of this page. Though I feel like a parent scolding a child, yours has been a childish endeavor in which I will not participate. I request that you do not further amend Patrick Murphy's links. I also suggest that you post your name, so that there is no mask under which these edits are being made. You ought to also include, as I did with my changes, supportable, valid reasons for your own editing. I am certainly satisfied with the logic of my own changes, and that there was no impropriety or misrepresentation in the edits I made. I will also not shrink into the obscurity of the internet; that is not my style. I suggest you follow my lead.
Dan Murphy

First I was wrong with my changing of Mr. Murphy's occupation I did not know of a difference between the two. Second I was just adding those other parties in to see what other thought. ThirdI understand leaving in his residence but him graduating from Phillips is unimportant on this page however if you would like to create his page then please go ahead I have already stated it for you all you have to do is add more information. Finally you signed your name incorrectly all you have to do is add 4 "~" of these after you are done typing. Gang14 17:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to my last statement the link you provided for his occupation as bricklayer says bricklayer or mason in the first sentance. Also in the article from the lowell sun the title is Lowell Mason runnning. So I was not wrong u were for assuming I meant free mason. second whats so wrong about being a free mason. Gang14 17:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We all must understand that articles about current elections run the risk of violating WP rules (see WP:NOT). That is why these articles must be excessively neutral. While the official recognition of a political party may be technically correct in some instances, it is not necessary here. We should just list candidates in the best NPOV possible. Therefore, I have put them all in alphabetical order first by party name, then by name. Let me add this: elections are not to be fought on wikipedia. Besides, no candidate could possibly win or lose based on anything posted here.—Markles 19:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Murphy

I was rereading the article from the lowell sun that talks about Patrick Murphy entering the race and it came to my attention that Patrick's fathers name is Dan so Mr. Murphy do you mind explaining yourself Gang14 17:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment above.—Markles 19:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historic document

Wikipedia is intended to be a historic encyclopedia, not a website primarily for news, current events, nor a campaign ticker. That's why I think we should keep candidates in the article who either: a) choose not to run; b) drop out; or c) lose. They should be kept on the same footing as other candidates with a perenthetical note. They should be alphabetical by party then by name.

For example:
==Candidates==
===Democrats===
* [[Terry Dropout]] (D)(Withdrew) - Mayor of [[Townsville]], endorsed Chris Winner.
* [[Chris Winner]] (D) - Professor of Ergonomics
===Republicans===
* [[M. Bobby Also-ran]] (R) - Shopping cart vendor
* [[Pat Ambivalent]] (R)(Not declared) - Spouse of the late Senator Ambivalent
—Markles 00:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed and after the primary placing those who lost into a seperate heading Gang14 02:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No other article on an election have I seen withdrawn candidates or candidates that decided not to run displayed under the same heading. I do think that they should be included in the article, but not under "candidates" because they won't appear on the ballot. I don't see why a seperate heading (which is standard in all other articles i've seen) would be a problem. --Tdl1060 21:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point about them not being on the ballot. After all, if we're looking for some official definitive list, that's the best. OK. I'm sold. Move the non-candidates to a separate heading. After all, they're not candidates.—Markles 22:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Default sort

Why did you put a {{DEFAULTSORT:}} which equals the Pagename? That seems redundant.—Markles 23:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies?

Should we add a section? Emily's list is the one thing I'd mention in it as well. Any opinions?

I'd add a prose section instead which can include any details of the race including all notable endorsements, debates, etc. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Comedy240 (talk • contribs) 00:07:20, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Any other opinons? Gang14 04:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Massachusetts's 5th congressional district special election, 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207164837/http://www.thebostonchannel.com/politics/14003157/detail.html to http://www.thebostonchannel.com/politics/14003157/detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Massachusetts's 5th congressional district special election, 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]