Jump to content

Talk:2009–10 Serie A

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Just so everyone can see the reason behind my editing of the goalscoring charts, Totti and De Rossi have NOT scored 5 and 3 goals this season, respectively. Totti has scored three, one against Genoa on August 23, and two against Fiorentina on September 20. De Rossi has scored two, one against Internazionale on August 29, and another one against Fiorentina on September 20.

Positions by Round

[edit]

Have we had serious discussion on whether such a chart should be part of the Serie A page? I, for one, think it is much more relevant than the massive chart we have for coaching changes that seems to take up half the Serie A page. The rise of Roma through the season can be clearly seen by looking at the chart. A few words on the season summary could hardly duplicate what this chart illustrates. I am tempted to re-instate the positions by round chart, but wait for other peoples' opinion.Juve2000 (talk) 21:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Juve2000, you and other interested users are invited to join the discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Positions-by-round table (PbR) and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Discussion on league season article format (league season articles in general). More opinions --> larger input --> broader consensus. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 22:33, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The image titled "Locations of the 2009–10 Serie A teams" is blocking a considerably large portion of the list of teams... I would change it, but I wouldn't know where to put it. I suggest that someone either delete it or move it because it is making the page quite disproportionate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.40.67 (talk) 01:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2009–10 Serie A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2009–10 Serie A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]