Talk:2011–12 Buffalo Sabres season
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Season count
[edit]This is the 41st season the Sabres have played in the NHL. There was no season played in 04/05 thus this is the Sabres 41st season. They celebrated their 40th anniversary the previous season. They have existed for 42 years as a franchise. — Comment added by Ericando (talk • contribs)
- It's the Sabres 42nd season in the NHL, as the franchise wasn't suspended during the lockout. Follow the examples used at 2005-06 NHL season to 2011-12 NHL season; where this 'lockout' anonmaly is dealt with. GoodDay (talk) 18:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- They've played 41 seasons. It's not that complicated of a thing. They celebrated their 40th anniversary the season before. To call this season 42 will only confuse readers. Call it their 42 year of existence if you must. They played 41 seasons of hockey.Eric Ando (talk) 19:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- You're not undestanding this properly. The Buffalo Sabres had a season in 2004-05, even though they didn't play any games. The franchise still existed & operated during 2004-05. An NHL season is more then games played. If you still disargee? seek advice at WP:HOCKEY. GoodDay (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- I understand it but I couldn't disagree more. A season is games played. A year of operation is a year of operation. The team's 20th anniversary season was 1989-90. The 30th anniversary was 1999-10. The 40th was to be 2009-10. It was postponed to 10-11 due to the lockout because there was no season played in 04-05. This disagreement is stupid. The article was worded fine before. It's at least more understandable with "(41st season of play)" included but I still think it reads awkwardly. Eric Ando (talk) 03:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- Nitpicking: The Sabres celebrated their 40th anniversary of becoming a franchise, which falls in the year 2010 - not necessarily their 40th season or 40th season of play. Anyways there's an inconsistancy among the NHL franchises, just look at the Ottawa Senators. The Sens are celebrating their 20th anniversay during 2011-12. If franchises are celebrating via season, then the Senators have recognized 2004-05 as a season. GoodDay (talk) 14:26, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- I understand it but I couldn't disagree more. A season is games played. A year of operation is a year of operation. The team's 20th anniversary season was 1989-90. The 30th anniversary was 1999-10. The 40th was to be 2009-10. It was postponed to 10-11 due to the lockout because there was no season played in 04-05. This disagreement is stupid. The article was worded fine before. It's at least more understandable with "(41st season of play)" included but I still think it reads awkwardly. Eric Ando (talk) 03:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- You're not undestanding this properly. The Buffalo Sabres had a season in 2004-05, even though they didn't play any games. The franchise still existed & operated during 2004-05. An NHL season is more then games played. If you still disargee? seek advice at WP:HOCKEY. GoodDay (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- They've played 41 seasons. It's not that complicated of a thing. They celebrated their 40th anniversary the season before. To call this season 42 will only confuse readers. Call it their 42 year of existence if you must. They played 41 seasons of hockey.Eric Ando (talk) 19:19, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Furthermore the 'awkwardness' you mention, will lead people towards finding & learning of the 2004-05 lockout. Where's the way you preffered it, less familiar readers would've mistakenly thought that the Sabres 'first season' was 1971-72, instead of 1970-71. GoodDay (talk) 14:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2011–12 Buffalo Sabres season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120302213357/http://sabres.nhl.com/club/recap.htm?id=2011020949 to http://sabres.nhl.com/club/recap.htm?id=2011020949
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321010528/http://sabres.nhl.com/club/recap.htm?id=2011021084 to http://sabres.nhl.com/club/recap.htm?id=2011021084
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)