Jump to content

Talk:2011 AFL finals series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability

[edit]

My personal opinion is that all comments of the style "this is the first time Team X and Team Y have met in a final/specific type of final since Year Z" are not notable. Seeking a consensus, and if achieved, a mandate to remove all such. Otherwise, general notability guidelines from Talk:2011_AFL_season#Gamenotes_-_notability should apply. Aspirex (talk) 08:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I agree those comments are non-notable and we should generally follow the guidelines we used during the season. Jenks24 (talk) 14:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2011 AFL finals series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]