Jump to content

Talk:2012–13 Philadelphia Flyers season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does Darthflyer own every Flyers season article? He sure acts like it.

[edit]

As I pointed out to User:Darthflyer, "There is no separate format specifically for the Flyers. Both the Flyers and Flames, as well as every other NHL team, fall under WP:Hockey." Without evidence, he continues to assert that the Flyers season pages are separate from WP:Hockey. If you look at each season article recognized by Wikipedia as a good article, they all have text under the Regular season, Playoffs, and other sections. They go into detail and are well-sourced. None of the short synopsis' Darthflyer writes are sourced and any sourced material that had previously been written he removes. For instance, see [1]. Though some of what was removed should have been trimmed in that instance, getting rid of all of it was ridiculous and the poor reasoning behind removing it was a slap to the face of every editor who took the time to write any of it, declaring it all "redundant" in the process. Yet he laughably accuses me of butchering pages. --Phifly (talk) 05:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Darthflyer was incorrect, the standard formatting of the season pages is a constant we try to maintain across every season for each team. The format we use is usually based off the good/featured articles we already have. Sometimes there are differences between one team or another as the standard gets upgraded or changed and pages haven't been changed to match it yet. As for how previous seasons of the Flyers are done, without having looked through the edit history of them I am guessing they are missing those sections because no one has written them yet. -DJSasso (talk) 18:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Exclusion of Goalies in scoring stats

[edit]

I noticed that the stats format changed slightly this season: I just want to point out if we are going to add a SUM TOTAL at the bottom, then the Goalies should be readded to the Scoring, err..."Skaters", table. Bryz's assist is no different than any other assist included. TerminalPreppie (talk) 18:25, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We should probably switch it back to the standard. -DJSasso (talk) 17:45, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2012–13 Philadelphia Flyers season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:06, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2012–13 Philadelphia Flyers season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]