Talk:2013 Critérium du Dauphiné

2013 Critérium du Dauphiné has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 17, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in 2013 Critérium du Dauphiné

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2013 Critérium du Dauphiné's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "CN3":

From 2013 Paris–Nice: Cossins, Peter (6 March 2013). "Talansky outsprints breakaway group for biggest career win". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
From 2013 Volta a Catalunya: "Quintana triumphs on Vallter 2000 summit finish". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. 20 March 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2013.
From 2013 Tirreno–Adriatico: "Sagan speeds to soggy Tirreno-Adriatico stage win". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. 8 March 2013. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
From 2012 Critérium du Dauphiné: Benson, Daniel (6 June 2012). "Boasson Hagen wins sprint on stage 3 of Dauphine". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 6 June 2012.
From 2013 Tour of the Basque Country: "Henao edges Betancur on climb to Trapagaran". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. 3 April 2013. Retrieved 3 April 2013.
From 2013 Tour Down Under: Malone, Alex (24 January 2013). "Slagter takes tough victory into Stirling". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. Retrieved 1 February 2013.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

linking the stages 1-8

Linking the stages 1-8 would be more comfortable to the reader [1]. Moreover, unfounded reverting [2] is very unpleasant. --46.115.74.172 (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

I am copyediting the article, and will place any questions I have here.

~~What does "was expected to result in a reduced bunch sprint" mean?~~

I think what I meant was that the result was going to involve a smaller group from the peloton as a whole at the finish line. I shall rephrase from there.

~~What does "who nearly caught Warbasse for two minutes" mean?~~

Riders started at one-minute intervals during the stage; Docker had started two minutes after Warbasse, and Docker almost caught him before the finish. I shall clarify with the one-minute intervals point.

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully that clarifies your queries, Mike. Craig (talk) 19:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Those fixes look good; both comments struck. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2013 Critérium du Dauphiné/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 11:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC) This is a fine article; I've copyedited and have left a couple of minor comments on the talk page, but those would not prevent me from passing it for GA. The only issue I can see is the use of the Inner Ring blog; can you say why this should be regarded as a reliable source? It's used nine times in the article.[reply]

The Inner Ring was the one reference I had been questioning myself, even before putting the article up for GA. I shall strive to find alternative sources for the elements referenced by that sites. Craig (talk) 19:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Otherwise everything looks good -- prose is in good shape, coverage is broad, I don't see any MoS violations, and the images all seem to be appropriately licensed. I've placed the article on hold pending resolution of the source issue. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes look good; I'm passing this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]