Talk:2018 Ole Miss Rebels football team

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Mississippi List‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).

Avoiding an edit war over the ranking table.[edit]

There is a dispute on whether or not the rankings table should remain a part of the article, and I seek to resolve this dispute on the talk page rather than engaging in an edit war. I hold the position that since the 2018 Ole Miss Rebels football team received votes multiple times throughout the year, the rankings table thus hold relevant information. The opposing position seems to be that, since the 2018 Ole Miss Rebels football was never given a top 25 rank, that the table should be removed entirely. Anyone else want to weigh in? Cubone5147 (talk) 12:35, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a ranking table. If they were never ranked then there is no reason for it. No reason to have a table to say something never happened. Receiving a few votes is not relevant enough for it's inclusion. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 16:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to who? Point me to a source other than yourself that says this is standard practice. Receiving votes is relevant enough to be marked on the table, but not enough for the table itself to be included? Your point of "it never happened so the table isn't needed" is based on the false belief that receiving votes isn't relevant. The bottom line is that Ole Miss was included in multiple AP rankings, therefore the table should remain. Cubone5147 (talk) 00:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. It is a ranking table. Meaning it is to denote if they were ever ranked. They weren't. Simply receiving votes is not being ranked and not worthy of inclusion. Bsuorangecrush (talk) 02:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Three votes now, including myself, on them being removed over at the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football.Bsuorangecrush (talk) 03:02, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]