Talk:25C-NBOMe

Inaccuracy in "Law" paragraph, Israel

according to the source (the relevant one, at least) [6] - "http://www.health.gov.il/LegislationLibrary/25574413.pdf" the only drug stated explicitly in the scheduling of May,13 in Israel is 25I-NBOMe, and not any other analogue (at least of this chemical group, the rest added are mostly synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists.) So according to the facts presented by the source (The Israeli government), only under the article about 25I-NBOMe there should be a statement about the specific substance's illegality. The information I have as an Israeli is that the specific scheduling mentioned was added after a high surge in the popularity and use of this specific type of NBOMe derivative in the Israeli drug (/Psychedelic?) market/community (25I), the other types (B/C/D) are almost unheard of, and so remained legal (so far). I hope this mistake will be corrected or clarified, as the topic of legality of substances is vague enough to the average Israeli and these types of errors aren't helping. Obviously I have no right to change the information only because the evidence of this only source contradicts it, but I challenge anyone who has the time to find anything to contradict me and respond (maybe a more recent scheduling order), or fix this probable mistake, also this should be clear that I'm talking about rewriting the facts on the other substances' articles.

Thanks for everyone's time and effort. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.109.37.236 (talk) 22:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

scheduling in australia

Does anybody have a link that explicitly displays the Australian government's scheduling of this compound as a Class C substance? I cannot find anything other than passing mentions of it in newspaper articles about overdoses etc. (which is what is provided in the article). flaming () 02:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

discovery

Is there any evidence that 25C-NBOMe was first synthesized by David E. Nichols? It does not appear in any research papers or thesis from the Nichols-group? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.68.105.0 (talk) 07:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

It was discovered by Ralf Heim along with 25B-NBOMe, it's described in his thesis --77.12.63.187 (talk) 23:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

25C-NBOMe is not mentioned in Heim's thesis, only the corresponding, 4-bromo, 4-iodo and 4-trifluoromethyl substituted N-benzylphenethylamines — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.59.104.188 (talk) 20:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Uniformity in naming

This article is named 2C-C-NBOMe, whereas the article for 25I-NBOMe is named... well, 25I-NBOMe. In the interest of uniformity, this article should be renamed to 25C-NBOMe. I have no idea how to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.56.109.32 (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

2C-C-NBOMe → 25C-NBOMe – Just like with 25B-NBOMe and 25I-NBOMe, the 25C name is much more common and avoids confusion with 2C-C. Mewtu (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.