Talk:9/Tenths
This page was proposed for deletion by Fayenatic london (talk · contribs) on 29 March 2023 with the comment: Film with no claim to notability, apparently screened only at its local festival. This article was originally written by the film's composer. Reviews at IMDb are poor except for two which appear to be written by friends of the production team. Coverage in other sources is very thin. Film was being re-edited in 2021, but no news on re-release. Suggest moving to Draft:Awaken (film) for now. It was contested by Mushy Yank (talk · contribs) on 2023-03-29 with the comment: may be notable (since 2020, announced for re-release as Awaken) |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 29 March 2023 by Fayenatic london. Error: Disclosures that use the |checked= parameter should also use |editedhere=yes for at least one contributor.
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on 9/Tenths. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061004102558/http://www.9tenths.com:80/ to http://www.9tenths.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]Hello@Fayenatic london. I am not quite sure I understand your edit summary on this TP. You did not mean to PROD the page? I left your name and rationale blank because it's generally the person who PRODs a page who puts the tag on. Anyway, I am not in favour of Draftifying, which is the best way to delete content without anyone noticing it. As for a date for the recut/restored version release, the Twitter account for the film was asking its followers to be patient (that was last year). I would wait but that's just me. — MY, OH, MY! 20:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Mushy Yank: I intended to PROD the page without deleting the info & citations that I had added about the 2020 re-editing. I think the article currently deserves deletion, but could be held as a draft for a while pending possible re-release of the film.
- Please would you re-edit the intro line to match the latest info? – Fayenatic London 20:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. Very sorry, but no, I won't edit the page if you mean to draftify it. Just as I don't put sources on pages that are Afded. Very sorry. — MY, OH, MY! 21:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Stub-Class film articles
- Stub-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Articles with connected contributors