Jump to content

Talk:Aïcha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Early posts

[edit]
  1. "It is also the name of the wife of the Muslim's prophet, Mohammed(see Aisha)" has nothing to do with the song.
  2. "In the Outlandish version, the praise is for the sister of one of the performers (as said in the beginning of the video clip)". The dedication in the song goes: "To all my sisters", this is a general dedication and isn't particular to anyone’s sister.
  3. “while in the Khaled's version he was probably praising his loved woman as seen in the video clip.” Khaled didn’t even write the words to the song
  4. “In the Outlandish version there was the same French sentence used by Khaled, "Aicha, Aicha, ecoute moi" (meaning "listen to me"), which gave the original singer, Khaled, some sort of credit.” The song credits Jean-Jacques Goldman since he wrote the words.

Waseem7


We can't list the full lyrics, they are copyrighted. We could include brief excerpts that are representative (but the details of copyright law on how much we can include exceeds my knowledge of Law). I believe we can leave the links to the lyrics on external sites. RJFJR 02:15, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


There needs to be some sourcing for the internet phenomenon section. There are countless rumors regarding the "Aicha video", yet there are no reputable or professional sources that discuss it.

Name

[edit]

Shouldn't this article be under "Aïcha" instead of "Aicha"? Keldan 16:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


There could be some mention of the video that all of these youtubes links redirect to. a minor internet sensation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.75.223.144 (talk) 06:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Aicha khaled.jpg

[edit]

Image:Aicha khaled.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

by GellieMan

[edit]

Can someone take away the Geliieman spam link... this is ridiculous, it is not a commercial release and link is probably put there by the guy himself.

Unfortunately I don't know how to edit wikipedia except for making comments in talk pages... If any external must be put up it mus be Outlandish massive hit cover version, which actually has sold more copies than Khaleds release... but to allow a kid to post a link to his own video on wiki is an insult to wikipedia --Dinofant (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be put back on. I'm sure the kid didn't link it himself, it's been on the Internet for years and has seen its days as a major Internet meme. It was a culturally popular item and that equals notability. 70.174.152.254 (talk) 04:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Aïcha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aïcha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aïcha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]