Talk:A Trip to Paradise (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

On 15 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from A Trip to Paradise to A Trip to Paradise (film). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 15 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 00:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– No indication that the hundred-year-old silent film has a higher-level historical legacy than the Playhouse 90 episode. The proposed creation of two-entry A Trip to Paradise disambiguation page would enable the listing of both the 1921 film and the TV episode, which should use a lowercase "t" in "to", per MOS:CT. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should just be WP:BOLD, Roman Spinner, and do it. I agree there is no precedence for the silent film. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both elements of the nomination may indeed be considered uncontroversial technical requests, Onel5969, however, the likely consensus to move would require adjustment of incoming links to the proposed dab page and I am experiencing technical problems with automated software. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your dab concerns, Roman Spinner - but if you move it, let me know and I'll take care of the dabs. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind offer, Onel5969. Since you are the creator of this and many other film entries, I should have consulted with you before submitting this nomination. However, now that one additional editor has weighed in, it would seem best to allow the process to play out in achieving a natural consensus. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 16:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support the film has 16 views and the episode has 11[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support since neither are the primary topic. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.