Talk:Abacination

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Samson

Samson was not abacinated. Saying that he was is denying the truth of the Bible. The Bible says that the Philistines gouged out his eyes. FrenchNerd487 (talk) 20:17, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What evidence do you have for your claim? Which version of the Bible are you using? Gillyweed (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ignoring the ridiculosity of putting "truth" and "Bible" in the same sentence, FrenchNerd487 seems to have a point. The relevant passage seems to be Judges 16:21. The 21st Century King James, Common English Bible, Darby Translation, American Standard, Good News and King James versions says that they "put out" his eyes; the Amplified Bible says "bored out"; The Contemporary English and "God's Word" edition "poked out"; The Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition "pulled out"; Easy-to-Read and New Century "tore out"; English Standard, The Message, Holman, and New American "gouged out"; New Life "cut out"; Young's Literal "pick out". The Hebrew Westminster Leningrad Complex seems to be using "pick" or "pluck" according to Google Translate. The Biblia Sacra Vulgata seems to use "eruerunt" which is third-person plural perfect active indicative of "eruo", which could mean "cast, throw" or "dig, tear, pluck". Apparently the word could also mean "to deliver", as in to deliver a child. Not sure if it's relevant, though. I cannot find any Biblical references to Samson being abacinated; I'm nowhere silly enough to be Christian so I'm not sure if there are any other places one could look. The only references I can find on abacination are ones quoting Wikipedia, and one limerick, one rap lyric, and one pop music lyric, bizarrely enough. I suggest we remove Samson from this article unless no one else wants to try a little digging. --konaya — Preceding unsigned comment added by Konaya (talk • contribs) 20:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing orphan status

Found this article through wiki entry Vlad Tepes. Suggest removing orphan status from this article Erock R Ph 16:16, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please upload some photos, paintings and if you are a classic painter create a picture please

meaning

the word refers to use of a basin, not a "metal plate" from Latin bacinus. That is, the face is plased in the hot basin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:41:4003:B7F0:B6D7:2F56:8CFA:41F8 (talk) 21:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not the only recorded use of the term

Christopher Foyle's "Foyle's Philavery: A Treasury of Unusual Words" is wrong: this word is used in Gene Wolfe's novel series "The Book of the New Sun", e.g. in "The Sword of the Lictor", Chapter XXIV: The Corpse. 2601:152:4C7E:A450:EFCB:64B:DA4B:E6FF (talk) 05:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]