Talk:About a Boy (film)

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: French / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the French cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Book overlap

Most of the plot discussion in this article should be moved to About a Boy since the book came first and the film is essentially the same. --ChrisJMoor 03:12, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:About a boy movie poster.jpg

Image:About a boy movie poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should the page be protected?

...'cuz it seems to be a constant target of vandalism. I am the 0dd1. (talk) 14:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About a Boy (film) → About a Boy – Primary topic based on page views in comparison to novel. That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 00:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Are you really going to make everyone look up the stats ourselves, or just trust you? How about some links - on all of your proposals. --Born2cycle (talk) 06:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- [1] (film). [2] (book, page moved). That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 06:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Reception Section

I've just had a major headache trying to split the Reception section from its copious sprawling mess into something slightly more readable. I was seriously considering pruning this section back significantly. I may well do. NKTP (talk) 19:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]