This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kabbalah, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.KabbalahWikipedia:WikiProject KabbalahTemplate:WikiProject KabbalahKabbalah articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
This article is rife with NPOV word usage and language. Examples include:
That Cohen "flourished"
"an ascetic of a remarkable type"
"subjected to the bastinado, for no other reason than that it was the usual method pursued by the Turkish government for extorting money from the Jews"
This is not an acceptable tone for a Wikipedia article, which is supposed to approach a subject from a neutral, facts-only point of view.—Perceval 01:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The first two issues are no problem. The term "flourished" is very common usage in biographies of scholars. It does not imply anything other than that this is the period in which the individual did their most important work. "Remarkable" is appropriate here as well, because in the context it clearly means "highly unusual." The last issue (extortion of money, etc.) should probably have a reference attached to it, as it could be considered biased. As the text was drawn from the Jewish Encyclopedia, however, there is no reason to think it inaccurate. I will see if I can find a reference for it. —Dfass 15:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
