Talk:Vachellia cornigera
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Requesting an image showing ant mutualism
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 30 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joannagallagher00.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2021 and 15 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BarkerK79.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Some Suggestions
[edit]It appears that you are trying to describe the Acacia cornigera plant itself, however you seem to talk more about the ant that lives with the tree. My first suggestion would be to add additional information about the tree - leaf type, colors, sizes, soil types, etc... I would also recommend adding pictures - the ant, the tree and how they work together. A picture of their leaves and their nutrient nuggets might be interesting too.
Under the Uses Heading, I would suggest clarifying whether these rememdies could still be used today and if so, what would you look for? Also, how did the indians get the thorns if the ant sting is a good deterrent from predators.
I would add too that you should reread through the article itself. Some sentences are slightly unclear, such as the first sentence of the second paragraph under mutualism. This paragraph could also benefit from a break point before it starts talking about the ant pheromones.
--Massonika 06:31, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Additionally: Might consider adding:
- That the Beltain bodies have no known function other than to provide food for the symbiotic ants.
- It would be interesting to highlight your mutualistic reference with one that is not. How some ant colonies are rival enemies, occupying separate trees and if contact with one another is made they will fight each other with the loser being forced out of their tree.
Solarone 15:40, 7 April 2006 (UTC)solarone
Thanks for the suggestions
[edit]I had a picture on the page, but unfortunately, it was deleted due to copyright issues.I'm not quite sure how to get around that one. I fixed the 2 confusing sentences. Regarding the acacia's leaf structure, this article is a subheading of the general Acacia itself and I didn't want to duplicate information. I added a new paragraphy discussing the pheremones.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Vachellia cornigera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060214094354/http://arnica.csustan.edu:80/biol1010/com_ecology/community_ecology.htm to http://www.arnica.csustan.edu/biol1010/com_ecology/community_ecology.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Evaluation of Page
[edit]The material presented is not well organized. It is not cohesive and is very broken up into sections. It doesn't have a very good flow. The information that is presented is relevant and understandable. The sources are outdated and one of the source's links does not work. There is more recent information available. There are a lot of links to other Wikipedia articles. There can be more information added to this article.
The article does have an introduction but it doesn't do a good job of summarizing the article and its contents. The leading paragraph does not briefly describe the article's sections. There are a few headings and subheadings but the majority of them only have a few sentences underneath.
The article talks more about the symbiotic relationship between the ants and the trees than it does the actual tree structure. The only description of the tree is about the thorns. The article does not talk about the tree structure, leaf shape, and thorn shape. The majority of the article focuses on the ants.
The pictures are good but there can be more pictures added to help describe the plant. There is also better pictures of the ants mentioned.
The coverage is unbiased and doesn't show any signs of bias. There is no attempts at persuading the audience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joannagallagher00 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)